Nonprofit Obtained 50% of all Breed ID Photographs in 2018
Photographs of six fatally attacking dogs in 2018 obtained from multiple sources.
Jump down to view all 2018 breed identification photographs or read our analysis first.
DogsBite.org - In 2013, we began the tradition of publishing breed identification photographs of fatally attacking dogs when available through news reports, social media websites and law enforcement agencies. Of the 36 recorded U.S. dog bite-related fatalities in 2018, 50% (18) had identification photographs, down from 56% in 2017 and 72% in 2016. Pit bulls and their mixes represent 83% (15) of all breed identification images collected in 2018, similar to last year.
Of the 18 cases with identification photographs, 56% (10) were captured by news media, down from 73% last year, and 56% (10) were located on social media pages of the dog's owner or family members. Half of all identification images in 2018, 50% (9), were the result of DogsBite.org research and otherwise may have gone unpublished. Police/shelter agencies only released photographs in 2 cases, yet 67% (24 of 36) of all deaths involved dogs taken into quarantine.
42% (15 of 36) of all dog bite fatalities in 2018 involved one or more fatally attacking dog shot to death at the scene by police or its owner.1
In 2018, nearly a quarter of the breed identification photographs, 22% (4), involved rescued or rehomed dogs that killed a person, of which 75% (3) had been vetted by an animal agency prior to being adopted out. 75% of these same fatal attacks occurred within 3 to 14 days after being adopted. In 2018, 78% (14) of all identification photographs collected involved family dogs that killed a household member. Of this subset, 43% (6 of 14) involved the dog killing its owner.
28% (5) of dogs with breed identification photographs in 2018 had a known history of human aggression before killing a person. Another 28% involved dogs with a known history of animal aggression (some cases involved both). 28% of cases with photographs involved the dog or victim living in the home for less than 60 days prior to the lethal attack. Two of these deaths involved infants, just 6 and 8 days old, carried out by a pet pit bull and wolf-dog hybrid, respectively.
Breed Misidentification Conflicts
In 2018, there were three breed misidentification conflicts; taxpayer-funded animal shelter officials perpetuated all three. The alleged "sausage dog attack" of Tracy Garcia in Oklahoma, can only be seen as fraud carried out by two employees of the Ardmore Animal Shelter. The cheeky media reports went viral, despite a statement by a veterinarian disputing them, the only professional who had examined these dogs while they were alive. The largest dog in the pack is clearly a pit bull.
It was not only the breed that Dr. Aldridge disputed, it was the weight of the largest dog too, which Aldridge estimated to be 55-60 pounds.
The second misidentification conflict involved a dog that was picked up as a stray on February 23, 2018 by Pinellas County Animal Services and identified as a "pit bull mix type." By March 14, the dog was relabeled a "Retriever/Hound" mix and available for adoption. The dog's first documented bite occurred at the adoption center on March 26 when the dog first met and bit its adopter, Paul Maser. Five months later, the dog fatally attacked an infant while under the care of Maser's wife.
The third breed misidentification conflict occurred in October after a family pit bull of eight years brutally killed its female owner in The District. Chris Schindler of Humane Rescue Alliance, the taxpayer-funded animal control contracting agency in D.C., deliberately distorted the truth about this "obvious" pit bull, calling it a "very large breed mix dog—mixed-breed dog" on television while standing in front of an Alliance transport van covered with large, vivid photographs of pit bulls.
Summary
With four public information requests still out at the time of writing this post, we believe that more breed identification photographs for 2018 will eventually be obtained. What stands out the most this year, as in the past, is the number of cases involving dogs taken into quarantine after a fatal attack (over 65% in 2018), but few police/shelter agencies released an identification photograph. We then can only rely on the news media being at the scene or images located on social media.
That 50% of all breed identification photographs in 2018 were the result of our research speaks volumes as well. Since "breed" is nearly always an issue after a fatal pit bull attack, and since a portion of taxpayer-funded animal shelter officials will lie to the media and the public to protect the pit bull breed, it seems fair that more law enforcement agencies should be releasing a breed ID photograph after a deadly attack, like the Citrus County Sheriff's Office did after a baby's death.
2018 Fatal Dog Attack Breed Identification Photographs
Post Publication Identification Photographs
Breed identification photographs discovered after the publication of this post on January 8, 2019. These photographs are not included in our overall analysis; they were unavailable at that time.
How We Track Photograph Sources
We track the identification photograph's original source. There also may be multiple images in one case, so multiple sources may be attributed to a single case. For instance, after the death of infant Khloe, the news media shot original images and through a FOIA, DogsBite obtained the original adoption listing images. Also, the news media can be an overlapping (dual) category because they often republish images provided by law enforcement that the public otherwise would not see.
What is easy to see in our tracking and analysis is the rising number of identification photographs located on social media, from only 16% (3) of all collected images in 2013 to 56% (10) in 2018. It is also easy to see the remarkably low number of law enforcement and shelters that release identification photographs after a fatal dog attack. They supplied just 11% (2) of the 15 cases with identification images and just 8% (2) of the 24 quarantine cases after a dog bite fatality in 2018.
Photograph Tracking Categories
- News media supplied photograph and/or an important republished photograph
- Social media website supplied identification photograph
- Law enforcement or animal control department supplied photograph
- Animal control allowed news media to take photographs inside shelter
- Canines shot to death at the scene of a fatal dog attack
- Canines taken into quarantine after a fatal dog attack
Related articles:
01/11/18: 2017 Fatal Dog Attack Breed Identification Photographs - DogsBite.org
01/09/17: 2016 Fatal Dog Attack Breed Identification Photographs - DogsBite.org
01/14/16: 2015 Fatal Dog Attack Breed Identification Photographs - DogsBite.org
08/31/15: Who Can Identify a Pit Bull? A Dog Owner of 'Ordinary Intelligence'...
01/07/15: 2014 Fatal Dog Attack Breed Identification Photographs - DogsBite.org
01/03/14: 2013 Fatal Dog Attack Breed Identification Photographs - DogsBite.org
Law enforcement departments across the United States should release consistent "baseline" information to the media and the public after each fatal dog mauling, including these items.
I am always so heartbroken when i read about children being killed by pittbulls. Any person really. I dont understand peoples facination with the monsters. I wish they would all be put down. I think they are useless. I think you guys do an amazing job of getting information out. Thank you very much for doing so. I wish that i could give you a donation. But i have no income and living with family. I hope i can help someday. Thank you for all the hard work you do.
I think it’s vitally important that people see these photos. The proof should be plain to all who see it except that pit bull apologists seem to be in denial about even the most clear evidence. It’s almost like a spiritual blindness. Media outlets and animal control officers who try to mask the breed of dogs in these attacks are culpable. But hopefully, many in the public will see these carefully gathered photos and begin to doubt the pro pit bull propaganda that has been shoved down their throats for years. With those photos, how could any clearly thinking person deny that these fighting breeds are a problem? Thank you for your diligent efforts.
I was looking at these dogs and thinking about all the pit apologists who flock to the news stories covering fatalities and bites and screech about how none of the dogs are “pure bred” and “No one knows what breed they are” and how you could put all these dogs pictured (except the wolf hybrid) in one class in a dog show and no one would think anything was out of order as they would if you put a Golden Retriever or Beagle or any other dogs that are obviously NOT pit bulls in with them. I am seriously beginning to think pit nutters are brain washed or have some other cognitive issue and I am very glad to be a “foamer” not a “nutter.”
When an attacking dog is listed as a ‘mixed breed’ I’d say 9 times out of ten at least it’s a pit mix. Although I’m seeing more ‘boxer mix’ pit bull attacks lately too.
See the story just above this one. Fatal dog mauling in Mississippi. The dogs were (cough-cough) mixed breeds.
This is EXCELLENT work and should be undeniable proof to any rational human being.
I really don’t think that nutters care about facts. The whole Pitbull advocacy thing has become such a money maker that everyone is going to continue to get on the bandwagon because its making people wealthy.
My Facebook account was disabled because of nutters, because the only way they will “win” is to silence the facts, but the sad part is they arent the ones that will pay for that. Its the people that listen to them and adopt a mauler.
I watch news regularly on YT and they are constantly calling an obvious Pit mix a “Labrador mix” or a “terrier mix” and this is how the maulers slide under the radar for less than credulous people.
Can you please explain how it makes people wealthy? I have some idea why people participate in pitbull cult for personal and emotional reasons, but Im ignorant about financial motivations, that apparently are part of it too?
Money is made in several ways. In some areas, especially California, rescues get dogs from the shelters for free, then go on to “sell” the dogs (relabelled as an adoption fee) sometimes for $1,000 or more. Also, the whole pit bull subject is rife with sob stories about dogs being bait dogs (which is false) in order to get money for “saving” it or for vet fees. There is an entire industry built around the “saving all pit bulls” mantra.
Is it not pure corruption – to mislabel the attacking dogs, putting your own breed likings before public safety? Shelter workers are like any other governmental workers – we pay their salary and expect them to do their job right. They should be punished harshly for abusing their position and the trust that the public has in them, just like cops get punished harshly for abusing their position and authority.
Your site provides a wealth of information that I use in my pediatric practice in Missouri. I routinely inquire about risks such as smoking, guns in the home, and pets. When told there are dogs I ask about breed and if pit bull or Rottweiler I cite your statistics and tell them of your web site address.
I usually get the same response “but my Pitt Wouldn’t hurt anyone”. My answer is always “what family would bring a baby into a home they thought the dog might attack?” Usually met with silence but worth the 5 min conversation if they consider breed risks