In the 15-year period of 2005 through 2019, canines killed 521 Americans. Pit bulls contributed to 66% (346) of these deaths. Combined, pit bulls and rottweilers contributed to 76% of the total recorded deaths. | More »
An 18-month old toddler was mauled to death by a pit bull while being babysat at a Newark home.
Pit Bull Kills Toddler
Newark, NJ - An 18-month old girl is dead after being attacked by at least one pit bull. The attack occurred Tuesday in the 100 block of 2nd Avenue near Wakeman Avenue around 9:30 pm, reports RLS Media. The dog was actively attacking the girl when Newark police arrived. She was transported to University Hospital, where she was pronounced dead. The attack comes just days after East Orange police, 4 miles away, shot and killed a "family" pit bull after it attacked three children and an adult.
The Essex County Chief Assistant Prosecutor, Thomas Fennelly, confirmed the girl's death was likely the result of a "canine attack" and that an autopsy will determine the cause and manner of death. Fennelly did not disclose the location or circumstances of the attack, the owner of the dog, or the breed of dog involved. Back in March, a pit bull killed an infant and critically injured his mother in a multi-victim "family" dog attack in Woodbridge, New Jersey, about 20 miles south of Newark.
Both CBS New York and WABC report the toddler was being babysat by a teenager at the time. The deadly attack occurred inside the first floor apartment. A "Beware of Dog" sign hung on the fence of the home. The front door of the apartment was open while WABC was filming. Apparently, the toddler "wandered away" and encountered the dog, reports WABC. Detectives are trying to obtain more information from family members, but they are so "distraught" they can't be interviewed yet.
Kawhon Jahnye, who lives nearby, told WABC he was stunned at the number of responders at the scene. "When I seen that amount of agencies and police enforcement and ambulances, I thought, 'My God, what's going on?'" Jahnye was later told by responders, "An 18-month old baby has been ripped apart by a pit bull, or a ferocious dog." Jahnye added, "That's the most horrific thing that can happen to anybody." A man exiting the home told a WABC reporter, "The dogs belong to my brother."
Finally, there are several discrepancies. WABC reports the attack occurred in the afternoon and the toddler was pronounced dead at 7:00 pm. Other outlets report that attack occurred at 9:30 pm. It's also unclear what "wandered away" actually means (Did the toddler wander away into a shared hallway or upstairs into a different apartment unit?). One pit bull was inside the apartment apparently, and 1-3 other pit bulls were "in the building." Newark Animal Control confiscated all of the dogs.
Clarifications: The fatal dog attack occurred in the late afternoon or evening, according to media sources who went to the location and spoke to neighbors. The 18-month old child, who was being watched by a teenage babysitter at the time, was pronounced dead at University Hospital around 7:00 pm. Four pit bulls were seized from the family's home, according to investigators, but it was unclear which of the dogs were involved. Authorities believe all four dogs belonged to a family member.
The home on 2nd Avenue in Newark's Central Ward where a pit bull killed a toddler.
Baseline reporting requirements:
Law enforcement departments across the United States should release consistent "baseline" information to the media and the public after each fatal dog mauling, including these items.
The dangerous dog hearing of Max, a high prey drive husky with animal and child aggression.
Statement of Decision
San Francisco, CA - On May 22, 2024, about a month before a San Francisco man had to scale a tall fence to escape two vicious pit bulls, another high-profile attack occurred in the city. "Max" the husky had been sitting under a table at an outdoor pizzeria with its owners, when he suddenly bolted and hunted down a child walking nearby with his nanny. After the male owner regained control of Max, he sat back down at the pizzeria and "finished his beer." Surveillance cameras captured the attack.
No attempt was made by the owners to provide their contact information to the boy's nanny. The couple said they were unable to because they did not speak English and because "everything happened fast." KABC-TV interviewed the child's mother, who had desperately tried to find the owners to obtain the dog's vaccination status so her son could avoid the rabies shots. At that time, SFPD's Vicious and Dangerous Dog Unit was investigating, and a hearing was set to be calendared.
Before the Vicious and Dangerous Dog Hearing was scheduled, KABCT-TV uncovered a previous attack by Max that was also captured on video. A year prior to the May 2024 attack near the pizzeria, Max attacked "Ajaxx," a smaller, 10-year old dog, unprovoked in the lobby of their building. Ajaxx's owner, Jomai DeHaven, filed a dog bite report afterward, but nothing ever came of it. DeHaven did not know he needed to file a Vicious and Dangerous Dog Complaint in order to open an investigation.
The hearing was held on August 6. DeHaven testified first, followed by the child's mother, Clair Wang, and his father. The parents were able to obtain multiple surveillance videos, which we overlaid on the hearing video. Both owners of Max, through an interpreter, testified next. Due to the nature of both unprovoked attacks by Max -- first to a senior dog, then a toddler -- we had a strong interest in learning how the hearing officer would rule in this case: muzzle restrictions or euthanasia?
Statement of Decision
The 11-page Statement of Decision by the independent hearing officer, Janelle Caywood, was issued on August 22. "All testimony and documentary evidence were carefully considered and incorporated," states the decision. We knew the prognosis for Max was poor, a two-time biter by the age of three and was neutered at the age of one. With unprovoked animal and child aggression, rehoming/rescue was off the table too. Max was declared Vicious and Dangerous and ordered to be humanely euthanized.
"Based on the testimony at the hearing, the documents, photographs, videos, and the above Findings, the dog Max meets the vicious and dangerous criteria ... The harrowing videos of the two attacks depicted in the videos in Exhibit 7 speak for themselves ... Max chased down, attacked, and bit a toddler in the right arm, yanking the child to the ground. Thereafter, the dog circled the child and nanny for 20 seconds, in a menacing manner, before the owners finally got control of the dog ... the boy and his nanny did not provoke, strike, tease, or antagonize Max. They simply walked along the sidewalk a considerable distance away from the dog and did nothing to justify this dog hunting down the toddler like prey, biting the boy, and swinging the boy to the ground. Even if the child had made noises as Mejia contended (which the undersigned did not find credible) a toddler’s sounds from a considerable distance away does not constitute provocation to justify hunting down the child and attacking him." - Statement of Decision, August 22, 2024
Caywood also wrote about the husky breed's "innate strong prey drive," which already requires careful management, the unlikelihood of rehabilitating Max through training due to his prey drive for children and dog aggression, and that his lack of bite inhibition was an indicator he would bite again. Given these elements combined, in addition to the fact that dog "owner compliance is never perfect," Caywood had little choice. There was only one sensible outcome in the matter of Max.
"Unfortunately, there is only sensible outcome in this matter: Max must be humanely euthanized to protect the community. Vulnerable children are most at risk for dog bites, so it is of paramount importance that the City and County of San Francisco take swift action when a dog has a propensity to hunt children as Max demonstrated on May 22, 2024. Huskies have an innate strong prey drive and require careful management as it is. But Max’s prognosis is poor and likely cannot be rehabilitated with training given his innate prey drive for children and dog aggression. Max lacks bite inhibition as evidenced by the fact that the child’s wound is so deep. A lack of bite inhibition demonstrates that the dog is likely bite again at the same depth or deeper which poses a grave threat to the children in the community. The dog’s behavior is not amenable to the remedies in Section 42.3(c)(ii) and the standard vicious and dangerous dog restrictions are inadequate to protect public safety. Muzzle and a short-leash mandates are not enough to protect the public from this dog because owner compliance is never perfect. Also, even if Max were ordered to wear a muzzle in public, Max could still attack a person in a private home or facility when lawfully not wearing a muzzle or when eating or drinking. Notably, Max has already been neutered and continues to bite at a dangerous level. This dog is unsafe to exist in the community and must be put down." - Statement of Decision, August 22, 2024
Discussion
The owners of Max had the dog neutered in late 2022.1 At that time, the dog was also vaccinated and microchipped. Max was wearing a leash in the videos but was not always under its control. Thus, the couple had some knowledge of responsible dog ownership and the city's laws. They had no knowledge of the husky breed, unprovoked aggression, or bite inhibition. Nor did they realize that failing to provide their contact information forced a 3-year old to undergo eight painful rabies shots.
"Her child suffered a deep bite wound, as well as additional teeth wounds, that was more horrible than she imagined and required five (5) stiches. Blood was everywhere and flesh was stuck to his clothes. Because they did not have rabies vaccine information, her child had to get eight (8) rabies vaccination shots, including shots directly into the bite wound, which were very painful." - Statement of Decision, August 22, 2024
After Max attacked Ajaxx, he was eligible for a Vicious and Dangerous Dog Hearing. Unfortunately, DeHaven had not known how to pursue that process. By the August hearing, Max had inflicted another vicious attack. After "hunting down the toddler like prey," Max menacingly circled the boy and his nanny. It took the owners two minutes to regain control of their dog. It was only after two attacks, and being ordered by SFPD, the owners recognized Max could never be unmuzzled in public again.
What occurred to this child is non-repeatable. There could be no "strike three" for Max. His owners being unable to comprehend the magnitude of Max's dog aggression and child aggression is irrelevant. The owners also do not have a yard, enclosed or otherwise. Meaning that every time Max had to relieve himself he would need to be leashed and muzzled -- a zero mistake dog. Sadly, what Mejia told the hearing officer, "Please don't take him, I will train him," is adolescent wishful thinking.
As Caywood pointed out, a muzzle restriction when in public, would not make Max safe indoors. He could attack a child in a private home while "lawfully not wearing a muzzle or when eating or drinking." Mejia stated they had no children in their home. But that could change, not to mention a child or infant visiting. Few entities beyond our readership understand the danger some huskies -- with or without these propensities -- pose to infants. The dog "Max" is set to be euthanized on September 3.
The Declined Witness
The child's mother and father were not present during the attack, only the nanny witnessed the attack. The nanny declined to be a witness, did not provide a written statement, and did not attend the hearing. Given the video evidence presented at the hearing, perhaps she thought she was not needed? Unfortunately, that left her statements to Wang as hearsay. "Wang's testimony regarding" the nanny's "statements were not considered for truth because they are hearsay," states the decision.
What if there had been no video, or the video only captured part of the attack on the child? That would have meant that the only witnesses providing testimony about the "events of the attack" were the owners of Max. Recall that Mejia stated on the record the child was making noises that provoked Max. "The baby was yelling or making noise, so the dog got up and ran. They didn't think that it was going to be so easy for the dog to come out from under the table," stated the translator for Mejia.
Even with video, key witnesses appearing and providing testimony is critical. Failing to appear can impact the hearing officer's final decision. Cornell Law states: "Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of whatever it asserts, which is then offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter. The problem with hearsay is that when the person being quoted is not present, it becomes impossible to establish credibility. As a result, hearsay evidence is generally not admissible in court."
Video Timestamps
We designated the following chapters in our video of the hearing to help readers navigate the chapters. At the 28:45 mark, you can watch all videos related to the attack on the child and what followed uninterrupted. Due to the translator, the testimony by Max's owners moves more slowly, but the questions Caywood asks are weighty, and you can see how she begins to formulate her opinion. Finally, there are some "wobblies" in the hearing video when switching angles; sorry about that!
00:00 Vicious and Dangerous Dog Hearing begins 07:59 Child's nanny declined to be a witness or provide written testimony 08:53 Witness DeHaven, the owner of Ajaxx, testifies 15:54 Video, Max attacking Ajaxx in the lobby 18:13 Witness Wang, the mother of child, testifies by phone 28:45 Videos (all) of attack near pizzeria and afterward 37:22 Witness Bekerman, the father of child, testifies by phone 41:35 Witness Mejia, female owner of Max 1:23:42 Witness Gomez, male owner of Max 1:40:30 Brief rebuttals of child's parents and DeHaven 1:43:39 Injury photos of Ajaxx shown 1:44:31 Rebuttals of Max's owners. 1:46:45 Recommendations from SFPD and Animal Control
1:53:00 Vicious and Dangerous Dog Hearing closes
From left: Ajaxx owner DeHaven, Max owner Mejia, and hearing officer Janelle Caywood.
Max at the pizzeria, the injured toddler, and Max walking away afterward with owner Gomez.
1Max was neutered on November 25, 2022, around the age of 10-12 months old. Both attacks occurred afterward, a year apart (05/13/2023 and 05/22/2024). This information was added for clarification on September 6, 2024.
A 33-year old man was killed by dogs in Chicago's Austin neighborhood.
Man Killed by Dogs
Chicago, IL - On Saturday night, a 33-year old man was found dead with multiple dog bites in Chicago's Austin neighborhood. The man was found unresponsive in the vestibule of a two-flat building in the 5500 block of West Quincy Street around 8:30 pm. Multiple dogs were located inside the apartment. The Cook County Medical Examiner's Office identified the victim as Keshon Bullock, 33, of Cicero. The cause of death was ruled a dog mauling; the manner of death was an accident.
The victim's name has multiple spellings, according to our online research, including Keshaun and Keshawn. Felicia Simmons King, who is a friend of 33-year old Keshawn Bullock and his relative Keith Bullock, stated in comments on the WGN-TV Facebook post that he was killed by "XL bullies." Facebook pages of both men show they were breeding pit bulls in 2013. Police did not release breed information. The victim was pronounced dead at the scene. No other information is known.
Victim was Dog Sitting
On Monday, more information was revealed after King responded to comments on the WGN-TV thread, stating about the victim, "Yes I know him, we grew up together." King also stated that Keshon was dog sitting at the time. "They wasn't his dogs," she wrote. "It was a close friend of his dogs he was just cleaning up and feeding them for him when he be out of town or at work (sic)." There have been other cases of pit bulls killing their dog sitters this year, including Kimberly Williams and Joni Hatcher.
A friend of the victim states he was killed by XL bullies on the WGN-TV Facebook post.
A friend of the victim states he was dog sitting; the dogs belonged to a close friend.
Baseline reporting requirements:
Law enforcement departments across the United States should release consistent "baseline" information to the media and the public after each fatal dog mauling, including these items.
Reuben Pierce, 70, died three months after being mauled by three violent pit bulls.
Complaint and Judgment
Jacksonville, AR - On October 30, 2023, "Reuben Pierce was attacked and mauled by defendants’ pit bull dogs. Reuben Pierce’s injuries were horrible and painful. Mr. Pierce was hospitalized and received medical care from October 30, 2023, until he passed away on January, 24, 2024," state court filings. On August 19, 2024, Judge Sanders Huckabee awarded the plaintiff a judgment against the defendants in the amount $5 million in compensatory damages and $10 million in punitive damages.
There were no media reports about this vicious attack when it occurred or at the time of Pierce's death. The first reports occurred in early April 2024, after the wrongful death lawsuit was filed on March 27, 2024 in the Circuit Court of Lonoke County. Both media reporting sources (The Arkansas Leader and The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette) are behind paywalls. However, the state of Arkansas has an open court record system, so we were able to obtain the relevant court filings for our readers.
The October attack occurred in the 200 block of Morgan Road in Jacksonville, where the defendants, Kenneth Cash and Jennifer Swartz, reside. Pierce lived across the street from the pair, according to property records. Both Cash and Swartz were sued for "wrongful death, negligence, battery, tort of outrage and punitive damages," states the filing. "Defendants were aware that their pit bulls had dangerous tendencies because the dogs had attacked and bitten other people," alleges the filing.
Included in the Complaint was a montage of images showing the "horrible and painful" injuries that Pierce sustained, while he spent the last few months of his life in a hospital, enduring "pain and suffering, mental anguish, severe injuries, and medical bills," states the filing. "The "defendants intentionally kept the pit bulls even though they knew they were dangerous and have attacked people in the past." The dogs belonging to the couple had also attacked other neighbors, alleges the filing.
Not long after the Pierce attack, a neighbor came under attack by the same dogs and was able to shoot and kill two of the pit bulls, reports The Leader.
The defendants represented themselves pro se and supplied a "handwritten" Response. They denied all 16 allegations. The judge disagreed. "Based upon the proof presented," the Court wrote, the "plaintiff is awarded compensatory damages of $5,000,000 and punitive damages of $10,000,000, for a total award of $15,000,000, against defendants, Kenneth Cash and Jennifer Swartz, jointly and severally." The defendants were ordered to supply the Court with a list of all assets within 45 days.
According to property records, Swartz purchased the home on the Ides of March 2023. Within seven months, the couple's pit bulls had attacked multiple neighbors and mauled Pierce. Both Cash and Swartz had been backyard breeding pit bulls, according to their Facebook pages. The stud, "Boss Hogg Cash" died in September 2022. The female, Izzy, had a litter in November 2022 (the last pairing with Boss Hogg). The Leader reported that three pit bulls were in involved in the mauling of Pierce.
Online court records show that Swartz was charged with two counts of unlawful dog attack, each a Class A misdemeanor, after Pierce's attack. Last month, she pleaded no contest to both charges. She was ordered to pay $2,320. Due to the civil judgment, she will likely now owe the Court funds for the rest of her life. Cash has a history of misdemeanor charges, largely driving offenses. However, that escalated in May 2024 after another traffic stop resulted in a felony drug possession charge.
The Massive Award
When defendants lack resources, large awards like this one are symbolic victories. Notably, The Leader reports that Jacksonville attorney John Ogles, who represented the estate of Pierce, also won a $1.2 million judgment against the owner of two pit bulls that attacked a Maumelle man and his dog last year. The defendant, Paul Stehley, was ordered to start making that payment in May 2023, however, Stehley appealed the order. The case has been stayed until the appeal is resolved.
Arkansas BSL Cities
Both symbolic monetary awards come as multiple jurisdictions in Arkansas are under pressure by pit bull advocates to repeal longstanding pit bull bans. In 2021, Cabot replaced their ban with mandatory sterilization and insurance requirements. Beebe kept their ban after hearing from Robby Taylor's parents in 2021, while Maumelle repealed their ban. In 2022, Jacksonville, the city where Pierce was mauled, kept their ban. Currently, Lonoke is considering a repeal of its ban, as is Sherwood.
The owner's Facebook pages: The primary stud, "Boss Hogg Cash," died in September 2022. The female, "Izzy," had puppies in November 2022. Two puppies seen in January 2023.
Baseline reporting requirements:
Law enforcement departments across the United States should release consistent "baseline" information to the media and the public after each fatal dog mauling, including these items.
View the DogsBite.org Google Map: 
