DogsBite.org Comment Policy

DogsBite.org is national dog bite victims' group. We do not post comments by pit bull advocates, pit bull breeders, dogfighters or related misguided animal groups. Victims of severe dog attacks -- and their family members and friends -- read our blog posts and comments. DogsBite.org will not subject these victims and family members to the onslaught of messages we receive that consistently blame victims for an attack and deny the genetic heritage of the pit bull breed.

DogsBite.org is not a platform for pit bull advocates. We are a platform for victims and people who care about these victims.

DogsBite.org will also sensor comments that are "off-topic," use excessive foul language, or include ad hominem attacks.

2008 Dog Bite Fatality: Great-Grandmother Killed by Her Two Family Dogs in Titusville

Victim Killed by Own Dogs
Titusville, FL - Police say a 74-year old Titusville woman was killed by her two family dogs. The woman suffered a dislocated shoulder and too many bite injuries on her body to count. "This poor woman endured a vicious attack," Lt. Todd Hutchinson, a Titusville police spokesman, said. Police think Lorraine May was breaking up a fight between the dogs. The dogs, which she had owned since puppies, had a history of fighting with each other, and were reportedly mother and son.

Police theorize that May was breaking up a fight between the dogs, who, according to a relative, are mother and son. The animals, which May had owned since they were puppies, had a history of fighting with each other, Hutchinson said.

The relative said the 11-year-old female golden-retriever mix is named Sammy, and the 6-year-old male Australian-shepherd mix is called Seth.

They are being held in separate cages at Brevard County Animal Services and Enforcement in Melbourne while workers there conduct an investigation, said the services' Capt. Bob Brown. They could be euthanized as early as next week. - Susan Jacobson, Orlando Sentinel, June 28, 2008

Autopsy results showed that May died of multiple "blunt-force trauma" caused by the dogs. According to a relative, an 11-year old female golden-retriever mix named Sammy, and a 6-year old male Australian-shepherd mix named Seth were involved in the attack. Both dogs were taken into custody and are being held in separate cages at Brevard County Animal Services while the investigation continues. Animal Services had received no prior complaints about the animals.

Related articles:
06/14/08: 2007 Fatality: Mary Bernal Killed by In-Law's Pit Bull
04/01/08: 2007 Fatality: Carshena Benjamin Case Closed, Unresolved

CHAKO vs. The City and County of San Francisco

Pit Bull Sterilization Law Victorious
San Francisco, CA - On June 3rd, 2008 the San Francisco Office of the City Attorney released a statement regarding the CHAKO case -- a pit bull advocacy group that sued San Francisco over its mandatory pit bull sterilization law. CHAKO challenged the validity of the ordinance, alleging that it violated numerous federal and state constitutional provisions, including the right to happiness.

US District Judge Maxine M. Chesney granted the City's motion to dismiss all claims with the exception of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) claim. Both parties have since settled the remaining claim, which resulted in dismissal of the lawsuit. Under the terms of the settlement, the City agreed not to enforce the sterilization ordinance against any person with a mobility-related disability who:

(i) owned an unsterilized pit bull service dog at the time the ordinance was enacted; (ii) uses that unsterilized pit bull service dog to accommodate his/her mobility-related disability; and (iii) had registered his/her unsterilized pit bull service dog with the San Francisco Department of Animal Care and Control by the time the ordinance was enacted. Any person who does not fall within this specific category remains subject to the ordinance.

City Attorney Dennis Herrera stated that although he continues to believe the ordinance is fully valid, the settlement is in San Francisco's best interest. "There is nothing about this ordinance that interferes with the ability of any disabled person to obtain assistance from service animals, and therefore it is fully consistent with the ADA," Herrera said.

CHAKO fits the bill of an egregious pit bull lobbying group. They stop at nothing when it comes to challenging the regulation of their breed, including misusing the rights of people with disabilities to prop up their goals. One can hardly stoop much further than this.

Related articles:
02/26/08: United States Supreme Court Leaves Intact Ohio Supreme Court’s Ruling that Breed-Specific Legislation is Constitutional

Report: Dog Attacks on Livestock and Horses January - May 2008

Seattle, WA - DogsBite.org, a national dog bite victims’ group dedicated to reducing serious dog attacks by creating common sense laws, has released its first report on dog bite trends. The report details the occurrence of dog attacks on livestock and horses in the United States from January 1st through May 20th of 2008.

View full report:
Report: Dog Attacks on Livestock and Horses January - May 2008

The report shows the results of dog attacks on livestock have been devastating. While various breeds of roaming dogs pose a significant threat to livestock owners, the research revealed that only pit bulls have a history of attacking large animals without a partner or group of dogs. Furthermore, without immediate human intervention, pit bulls may not take down just two or three animals, but may continue until they have killed an entire herd.

"Another major attack occurred just a few months later in Quincy, Illinois. Three pit bull mixes killed 34 pet deer that were penned. The livestock owners were left with two animals. The valuation of the herd fell from $50,000 to $3,000 in a matter of hours."

Pit bull type dogs are the most common "fighting breed" and are comprised of several types of dogs: American pit bull terrier, Staffordshire bull terrier, American Staffordshire terrier, bull terrier, and any other pure bred or mixed breed that is a combination of these dogs. Selective breeding of pit bulls has created a dog with powerful jaws and unmatched tenacity. The report shows the difficulty of constraining pit bulls as well:

"Pit bulls are also notoriously difficult to constrain, particularly when in high-prey drive mode. Ample evidence exists that a pit bull can scale a 6-foot fence, break tethering methods -- including chains -- bite through wood slats and chew through metal to reach their target."

In the area titled, "Livestock Attacks on the Rise," the report details the Pit Bull Epidemic that occurred in Lubbock County, Texas between January 1st - March 18th 2008. The epidemic did not end until a child suffered serious injuries by a loose pit bull and a senior citizen was mauled by a stray dog that still remains unidentified today.

"By March 18th, the death count had reached 23. Animals killed by loose pit bulls included over a dozen goats, three prize winning potbelly pigs and three miniature horses, two of which were therapy animals owned by Hearts and Hooves Ranch. Several more of their miniature horses were left badly wounded. The shocked community raised $10,000 in donations for immediate veterinary costs for Hearts and Hooves. Rarely are livestock owners as fortunate."

In the area titled, "Horse Attacks on the Rise," the report warns horse owners that a single pit bull is just as lethal as a pack of dogs to a horse owner. It also reveals that the number of horse attacks in Britain, primarily by pit bull type dogs, has increased so rapidly in the last year that the British Horse Society (BHS) is now tracking them. The report urges US horse organizations to do the same.

"This past April, three horses with riders were attacked by pit bulls in nearby parks. The first, an attack on a young Arab-Morgan gelding occurred near Auburn, California. The pit bull attacked the horse's flank first, then locked onto the horse's nose. The gelding flung the dog into a nearby tree before losing balance and sending the 70-year old rider toppling to the ground. The dog attacked a third time, launching the two animals into a dead run. The horse was found three miles out. The pit bull and his owner were never found having fled the scene."

The latter portion of the report addresses the ineffectiveness of current US dog laws in semi-rural counties, particularly when it comes to animal attacks (as opposed to human attacks). It urges US livestock and horse owners to actively engage in the legislative process to ensure that "animal attacks" are strongly penalized.

"By the time a dog is legally labeled a Dangerous Dog (DD), it may have inflicted three attacks. These attacks may result in the loss of many livestock animals. Furthermore, as is often the case with pit bull owners, once the dog is given the DD label the owner will put the dog down. The financial cost of ownership becomes too high. The owner is then free to go out and buy two new pit bulls, and the process starts all over again."

Finally, the report reviews a variety of laws that can help protect livestock and horse owners from future attacks including: placing "potentially dangerous" or "dangerous" designations on specific breeds, banning certain breeds and limiting the adoption of these breeds from county animal shelters. The report notes that the state of Ohio, a handful of U.S. counties and about 250 U.S. cities already regulate pit bulls and other fighting breeds.

View full report:
Report: Dog Attacks on Livestock and Horses January - May 2008