Tuesday, June 19, 2012



posted by   |  permalink  |  16 comments  | iconforum  |icon subscribe  |icon comment rss 

16 comments:

Blogger Your Quiet Neighbor  |  6/15/2012 9:46 AM  |  Flag  
Enough already! It's time to do something to protect the public health and safety.

And I don't mean more education of dog owners. I mean real protection from dangerous dogs.

We've had way too many people dying horrible, needless deaths.

Blogger Decatur AL livin nt to 4 pits  |  6/15/2012 1:26 PM  |  Flag  
On my informal count this is the 10th child death under 2 years. If you add the 4 year and the 6 year old it comes to 12 deaths. Then in the next age bracket there are 4 deaths age 59 to 92. I could have made a mistake but it looks like there have been no deaths in the age group from 6 years to 59.

Blogger vintage  |  6/15/2012 3:51 PM  |  Flag  
This was California's 41st Pit Bull DBRF!

What an epic public safety disaster the State got itself into allowing the Dog Lobby to install a Pre-emptive BSL prohibition.

Might as well change the name of the state to MAULIFORNIA!

Blogger Your Quiet Neighbor  |  6/16/2012 6:00 PM  |  Flag  
Here we go with yet another set of heart-rending photos. Not of the deceased child, mind you. Of course not.

Let's all shed tears for those poor little doggies behind bars. What did they do to deserve such a cruel fate?

Blogger Sweetie Pie  |  6/17/2012 3:46 AM  |  Flag  
Case manager Grothe says “This family has nothing, and we need to help them bury baby Tyzhel.”

But apparently the mother and the roommate who lived in that place had enough between them to support three pit bulls.

I suppose 'having nothing' is relative to some people. You know, it all depends on what you have left after you've fed the pit bulls.

OpenID truthbird  |  6/17/2012 9:54 PM  |  Flag  
I wonder if this social agency is just trying to cover their tracks? The poor mother was homeless previously and had been abused (and probably much worse). Her so-called "recovery" and her trying to "redo her life" included living with three male pit bulls and a baby in a small apartment? This caseworker was well aware the woman was living with these dogs and apparently this was OKAY? This social agency might be directly responsible for this woman getting her baby back; it's highly likely the child had been under the care of other forces when she was "unrecovered." So now the agency might have a dead baby on their hands...

OpenID truthbird  |  6/17/2012 10:04 PM  |  Flag  
Here's more on Anita Grothe, the caseworker:
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/anika-grothe/37/357/3ba

Client Services Coordinator at BILATERAL SAFTEY CORRIDOR COALITION
Counselor/Intern at McAlister Institute
Supervisor/ Care Manager at Stand Up For Kids

Blogger Candormd  |  6/17/2012 11:54 PM  |  Flag  
" woman who works with a nonprofit that helps struggling women"



A social worker didn't report these dogs on premises?

That is a crime. They helped set up this child to be killed.

Blogger Candormd  |  6/17/2012 11:58 PM  |  Flag  
McAlister Institute has a lot of explaining to do.

Are they helping and protecting kids, or are they protecting and enabling fighting dogs?

Blogger snack sized dog  |  6/20/2012 12:20 AM  |  Flag  
This story seems to illustrate, more than any other I've read, the horrors that these pit pushers are causing. If the story is accurate, the women did not leave the child alone with a baby. They had judged the dog as an individual, and they judged it to be a nanny dog.

Their apparent beliefs and practices seem to clearly have been gleaned from internet pit bull pushers' propaganda.

They also seemed to be practicing "crate n' rotate." More advice from pit bull pushers that tells you its ok to keep dogs that show aggression to each other - it is workable and safe, and further, it is negligent to do anything but keep them and separate them once you've got them.

My guess is that the dogs weren't altered, but this also comes from pit bull propaganda. The pushers say out of one side of their mouths that pits should be neutered and un-neutered dogs are more dangerous. But out of the other side of their mouths they say MSN is bad. This is to please the breeders and the AKC, but it has the effect of telling people, its ok, its a valid choice to not neuter and to breed.

Heck, Donna Reynolds of Bad Rap even said - who can blame people for trying to make ends meet by breeding a few pit bull puppies?

I see the mother as probably having had no breaks in life and having made bad decisions with no one in her life to teach her how to make good decisions. She has been preyed upon by pit bull pushers. And now they're throwing her under the bus.

Blogger Sweetie Pie  |  6/20/2012 12:30 AM  |  Flag  
I'm glad the one pit bull is dead, but the rest is insane. Animal control thinks it's irrelevant that the other two have killed cats? These women both wanted the other two pit bulls back -- and got them? After this, they still believe the other two would never do such a thing cos they seem so friendly, just like they thought the first one wouldn't cos it seemed to friendly?

It's mind-boggling.

There's no baby in the house at the moment, not anymore. But what if there is again a year or so from now? I suppose Grothe (or any other case worker) won't be able to do much even if they want to, since there's not law that says you can't keep babies with a house full of pit bulls.

This all just too sad.

Blogger snack sized dog  |  6/20/2012 2:06 AM  |  Flag  
I agree, Sweetie Pie, it does boggle the mind that they'd take these dogs back.

My link to Donna Reynold's thoughts that no one should blame poor people for choosing to breed pit bulls doesn't work. Here it is:
http://badrap-blog.blogspot.com/2011/11/grateful-for-everyone-who-steps-outside.html

Blogger Your Quiet Neighbor  |  6/20/2012 2:36 PM  |  Flag  
In my neighborhood, animal control returned dogs that chased several neighbors. Including me. No one's been hurt -- yet.

Blogger skeptifem  |  6/22/2012 5:09 PM  |  Flag  
candorMD
"A social worker didn't report these dogs on premises?

That is a crime. They helped set up this child to be killed."

I know a social worker or two, and they don't report things that they can't really do anything about. It isn't illegal to have pit bulls around children. If someone had displayed some behavior of neglect regarding the animals it might have been reported, but one would have to be pretty damn stupid to do something like that in front of a social worker.

OpenID cc7b6480-ba8f-11e1-aef0-000bcdcb471e  |  6/24/2012 5:52 PM  |  Flag  
skeptifem gave incorrect information about social worker activity.

Yes, social workers are to report situations where the child is endangered, such as a living situation with three large breed dogs that are so aggressive they must be separated from each other, as was the case here.

Also, a pack of large breed dogs in a small living situation can easily knock down a child and cause injury.

Social workers are also required to report situations where assistance may not be going to the needy child, such as assistance being used for dogs instead of needs of child, or there is an unreported business, such as a breeding business.

Social workers have failed to report situations like these, and have been fired or sued when injury or death occurs.

Blogger Packhorse  |  6/26/2012 3:38 PM  |  Flag  
There are countless pit nuttery books out there, some of which are geared toward children. Has anyone thought of writing a book exposing the truth behind the the pitbull talking points? (I'm thinking maybe the folks behind the Truth About Pitbulls website.)

Post a Comment »

archives: