Study: Injury Prevention Requires "Vigilant Adult Supervision"
A summary of a recent Central Texas pediatric study about dog bite injuries.
View Abstract
Temple, TX - Last fall, the Journal of Pediatric Surgery accepted a study from researchers at Texas A&M University Health Science Center in Temple, Texas. The study was recently assigned to the journal's July 2019 volume. We summarize this powerful study in advance, as critical elements stand out: the number of cases where parental presence was reported (43.6%) and a sudden reversal of gender among pediatric dog bite patients; 57% were girls in this series.
Also last fall, we published two tables summarizing Level 1 trauma center studies characterizing dog bite injuries across major U.S. geographical regions from 2011 to 2018. The majority of them show that pit bulls are inflicting a higher prevalence and severity of injuries than other breeds of dogs. The Central Texas study reports similar findings and echoes results from the pediatric Level 1 trauma center study in Phoenix (Garvey et al., 2015) published by the same surgery journal.
Both pediatric studies report similarities in injury circumstances, the patient's relationship to the dog and that pit bulls accounted for the most severe injuries. In Garvey, pit bulls were responsible in 45.5% of cases with the highest AIS of 3-5 (Abbreviated Injury Scale) and inflicted 38% of all head, neck or face bites. In the Central Texas study, pit bulls were the most frequently identified breed, 36.2%, and were also the "most commonly identified breed to have caused major injury."
Pediatric Dog Bite Injuries in Central Texas
Pediatric Dog Bite Injuries in Central Texas, by J.T. Abraham and M. Czerwinski, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, July 2019 [2018 Oct 31, Epub]
Results: One-hundred and two patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 5.84 years, and 43.1% were preschool-aged (2–5 years). Parental presence was reported in 43.6% of cases, and most attacks occurred in the evening (46.8%). Injuries often involved the head-neck region (92.1%), and 72.5% were of major severity. Pet dogs were responsible for 42% of injuries, and pit bull was the most-identified breed (36.2%). Most injuries occurred while the child was at home (57.8%) and was petting or playing with the dog (28.4%). Intervention in the operating room was required in 34.3% of patients. Major injury was more likely to require operative intervention (p = 0.015) but was not associated with patient age, sex, pet status, or the need for hospitalization.
Methods and Patients
A retrospective review of the pediatric trauma registry was conducted for this study. Patients who were treated at [blinded] emergency department in Texas from October 2011 to October 2016 after sustaining a dog bite injury were evaluated. Inclusion criteria were persons ≤ 18-years old who sustained a dog bite injury and were presented to the emergency department directly or as a transfer from a regional center for continued care. 102 patients met these inclusion criteria.
Of the 102 patients, ages 3 days to 16-years old, 57% were female. The majority of patients were pre-school aged children, 2-5 years old.
The mean age was 5.84 years and pre-school aged children, 2-5 years old, where the highest afflicted group, 43.1%, followed by children ages 6-12 years old, 41.2%. Infants and toddlers (< 2 years) accounted for 10.8% of injuries. In 43.6% of cases, a parent was present at the time of injury; not present in 30.7% of cases and in 25.7% of cases supervision was unreported. 92.1% of cases involved injury to the head-neck regions and 72.5% of injuries were of "major severity."
In contrast to years of pediatric studies -- both large-scale and small -- showing that boys are the most predominant dog bite victims, the Central Texas study showed that 57% of patients were girls. (We saw a similar sudden gender reversal in our 2018 dog bite fatality report. For the first time ever, among ages 0-9, girls were the most predominant, 80%, 12 of 15 victims). The Garvey study also cites a 2013 facial fracture study of 17 patients where girls were the majority, 53%.
The Central Texas study findings show that the evening (5:00 pm to 8:59 pm), accounted for nearly half of all injuries, 46.8%. Afternoon followed (noon to 4:59 pm; 28.7%), night (9:00 pm to 4:59 am; 13.8%), and morning (5:00 am to 11:59 am; 10.6%). Notably, December had the highest percentage of injuries, 14.7%. The spring months (March to May) accounted for the most injuries, 31.4%. Followed closely by winter months (December to February) with 29.4% of injuries.
At least two other pediatric dog bite injury studies (from 1998 and 2000) showed that evening hours accounted for the majority of injuries.1
Though some of these findings are known from previous studies, they are extremely significant. The majority of patients were familiar with the dog, 57.8% of injuries occurred while the child was at home, a parent was present in 43.6% of cases, 92.1% of cases involved injuries to the head-neck region and winter months accounted for 29.4% of injuries. Recall that National Dog Bite Prevention Week, which signals the start of the traditional dog bite season, is held in mid April.2
Major Injuries and Dog Breeds
72.5% of patients suffered "major injury," a classification based on the likelihood of operative intervention or that an impairment of physical abilities would occur. Included in these injuries were 6 cases of craniofacial fractures (a high rate, 5.9%, and comparable only to the 2015 Garvey study, which had a 4.6% facial fracture rate) and 2 cases of major vascular injury.3 There were no fatalities in the Central Texas study, and injury severity was not associated to the patient's gender.
A total of 80 dogs were identified by breed in 75 encounters, 73.5% of cases. Pit bulls inflicted the highest prevalence of injuries, 36.2%, over 3 times more than the next breed, Labrador retrievers, inflicting 10%. Pit bulls were also the most frequently identified breed in causing major injury. Pet dog(s) from the child's immediate family was responsible in 41.4% of cases. Nonpet dog(s) belonging to a relative, 19.2%, or a friend, 17.2%, made up the majority of the remaining cases.
The Central Texas study shows that about 60% of cases involved family dogs belonging to the child's immediate and extended family.
The discussion portion of the Central Texas study focuses in part on two frequent scenarios that result in attacks. In the first scenario, dog owners mistakenly "assume their dogs can be trusted in all circumstances." In the second scenario, parents are not closely monitoring benign interactions, particularly during the evening hours, such as a child playing with or petting a dog, which was the most common injury scenario in this study, 28.4%, followed by "no initiated interaction," 13.7%.4
"Familiarity with a dog should not be considered a preventative measure," states the Central Texas study, "as most victims are familiar with the attacking dog." A shared finding of the 2015 Garvey study, which stated that, "dog familiarity did not confer safety." In both studies, pit bulls were also singled out for requiring the longest hospital stays.5 The Central Texas study calls on "vigilant adult supervision, and a zero-tolerance policy," as an injury prevention recommendation.
Lastly, because the Central Texas study was blinded, authors could not determine the rate of pit bull attacks based on prevalence. The Garvey study, however, could. Phoenix Children's Hospital is located in Maricopa County. Garvey cites a 2012 news report of county records showing that pit bulls accounted for 6.25% of the licensed dog population. Despite this, pit bulls accounted for 39% of all injuries, 45.5% of cases with the highest AIS and 38% of all head, neck or face bites.6
Morbidity of Pediatric Dog Bites: A Case Series at a Level One Pediatric Trauma Center
Morbidity of Pediatric Dog Bites: A Case Series at a Level One Pediatric Trauma Center, by Garvey EM, Twitchell DK, Ragar R, Egan JC and Jamshidi R, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, February 2015;50:343-6.
Of 650 dog bite incidents, 282 met the criteria for inclusion in the trauma database. Median age was 5 years (range, 2 months to 17 years) and 55% (154/282) of patients were male. Pit bulls were most frequently responsible, accounting for 39% (83/213) of incidents in which dog breed was documented. Fifty-three percent (150/282) of dogs belonged to the patient's immediate or extended family...
Among the 11 patients with the highest AIS (3–5), Pit bulls were responsible in 45.5% (5/11) of cases, followed by mixed breeds in 18.2% (2/11) of cases. Pit bulls were also responsible for 38% (11/29) of all head, neck or face bites...
Dog familiarity did not confer safety, and in this series, pit bulls were most frequently responsible. These findings have great relevance for child safety.
Summary
Our nonprofit will continue to monitor pediatric dog bite injury studies from regions across the U.S. The Central Texas and Garvey studies (south and southwest regions) point to family dogs as the primary attackers of children, as do other pediatric studies dating back to 2002.7 Both also note an elevated attack rate in the month of December. The gender role reversal in the Central Texas study of 57% girls is the first we have seen in a pediatric study population of 100 or more.
What should alarm dog-owning parents is that parental presence was reported in 43.6% of cases. Nearly 60% of the attacks occurred in the child's home and 46.8% occurred during the evening. Further, "Medium- to large-sized dog breeds, particularly pit bulls, can cause significant injury to the head and neck region, necessitating medical care at a specialized center, and should not be under the responsibility of amateur or irresponsible owners," the Central Texas study concludes.
Excerpt from peer-reviewed medical study: Pediatric Dog Bite Injuries in Central Texas (2019)
2In Garvey, the most common months of injury were July and November, during which 24% of injuries occurred. August and December followed, during which 20% of injuries occurred. In our nonprofit's research of fatal dog maulings over the last 14 years (2005 through 2018, which combines children and adult age groups), May and November are the most common months (21% of deaths), followed by August and December (20% of deaths).
3Pediatric studies often report a facial fracture rate of 1 to 1.5%, including (Saadi et al., 2018), a large-scale study.
4Circumstances of injury were known in 74 of 102 cases. The percentages provided (as well as the 28.4% stated in the abstract), reflect a comparison to the overall 102 patients. So 28.4% (29 of 102) of cases involved the child playing with or petting the dog, and 13.7% (14 of 102) of cases involved "no initiated interaction."
5Within the "major injury" section, the Central Texas study states, "Two patients required monitoring in the intensive care unit (lengths of stay: 1 day and 3 days) after sustaining major injuries at home by pet pit bulls." The longest stay in the Garvey study was 25 days after a boy was attacked by a pit bull. Garvey also reports, "The high incidence of operation, fractures, and external genitalia wounds raise the possibility of increased severity of injury in our region compared to others. It may also relate to the high percentage of pit bull involvement in this cohort."
6 The Garvey study examined 282 dog bite patients evaluated at Phoenix Children's Hospital from October 1, 2007 to December 31, 2013. The authors cite a news article, "Dog Registration in Maricopa County. Dog Licenses by Zip Code," published by AZ Central in 2012 for their data. The study states, "In 2008, there were 122,017 licensed dogs in Maricopa County, the most populous county in Arizona. Pit bulls accounted for 6.25% (7,632/122,017) of the licensed dog population, only the seventh most popular breed. Labrador retrievers were the most popular breed accounting for 25.7% (31,377/122,017) followed by German shepherds at 13.8% (16,881/122,017)."
7In (Kaye et al. 2009) 69% of cases involved dogs known to the injured children. "This suggests that familiarity with a dog is not a safeguard against an attack," states the study. Kaye cites a 2002 pediatric study with similar findings.
Related articles:
09/28/18: Level 1 Trauma Center Studies Characterizing Dog Bite Injuries (2011-2018)
09/20/17: Which Dog Breed has the Highest Prevalence and Severity of Injuries in Recent ...
10/10/16: Level 1 Trauma Center Studies Characterizing Dog Bite Injuries (2009-2016)
05/22/11: Texas Doctors Produce Study: Mortality, Mauling and Maiming by Vicious Dogs
“Medium- to large-sized dog breeds, particularly pit bulls, can cause significant injury to the head and neck region, necessitating medical care at a specialized center, and should not be under the responsibility of amateur or irresponsible owners.”
But this is the familiar Catch-22. Irresponsible people, almost by definition, are precisely who are likely to own pit bulls.
I did not read the study but I think there are some limits to this study.
– I suspect the percentage of pits responsible is much higher since I suspect the breed was reported by the adults in the child’s life. We all know that there is a campaign to deny the dog is a pit when it attacks. Seeing that labs are #2 only makes me more suspicious.
-I suspect that in a higher percentage of scenarios, the adult was not in the room but stated they were to not get in trouble by CYS. Doesn’t matter because this makes the stats clear how dangerous these dogs are.
-Pit bulls as 6.25% of the licensed dog population. Keyword is “licensed” because at least as many if not more are not licensed and then there are plenty that are licensed and the owner claims the breed is lab or beagle or hound or mutt to not have problems with getting home owner’s insurance.
Anyway, this study confirms what we all know.
Gladiator dogs, by definition, are man-made mutants.
In order to create dogs that will attack and fight to the death over nothing external, on instinct only, even far from home at a distant battle pit, normal dog social behaviors are reduced or eliminated.
Normal dogs need a reason to attack. “Good” gladiator dogs carry their pathological reason to attack: instinct, inside with them, every where they go.
Good gladiator dogs are like hand grenades: perfectly safe until suddenly they aren’t.
With hand grenades, it’s the little pin thing that makes them explode. With gladiator dogs, it’s instinct: inside, invisible and impossible to predict, that controls the gladiator dog’s pin.
Good fighting dogs need to be willing to attack unprovoked, simply because of awareness of the opponent/victim.
Good fighting dogs do not waste time or energy giving warning signs, they just do it. Good Beagles don’t give warning before doing their barky chasey thing, tormenting rabbits. They just do it.
The point of warning display from normal dogs is to avoid conflict. “Good” fighting dogs want to attack.
There’s no reason to give warning when the goal is the attack. They aren’t born with the ability and drive to fight to the death, as they aren’t born with teeth. But all good game insane dogs do develop teeth and all good gladiator dogs do “start”, “turn on” and exhibit the horrible man-made behavior.
Some start as puppies. Some not till seniors. These are called “late starters”. Many first display this horrific trait at 18-36 months of age.
Good gladiator dogs will attack and kill other dogs, including opposite sex submitting puppies.
Since killing your own family for no reason is a horrible insane mutation, no other species is safe when instinct to attack and not stop meets opportunity to reach a victim.
No training or abuse are necessary just as no training or abuse is necessary to cause beagles to bark and chase rabbits.
No person, group or business that has the welfare of all dogs as a priority would want more game insane dog killer dogs to be born.
It’s cruel to other dogs and humans to support dog fighters and their selective breeding for unprovoked prolonged deadly aggression.