Veteran animal control officer John Holmes, a key proponent of the ban, retired in 2015.
Pit Bull Attacks Rise
Pawtucket, RI - Five years after Pawtucket was forced to lift its successful pit bull ban, attacks by pit bulls have risen sharply. Today, there are over 10 times more pit bull attacks per year in Pawtucket than there were during the ban years. The city was forced to lift its ban due to the state legislature, which passed a state preemption law in 2013 barring local governments from enacting breed specific laws. Other jurisdictions in Rhode Island lost their pit bull laws at that time too.1
Back in September 2013, we did an extensive report on the success of Pawtucket's pit bull ban, when attacks inflicted by the breed fell into scarcity. During the 10-year ban period of 2004 through 2013, only 23 bites were attributed to the pit bull breed. Over the five-year period of July 1, 2014 to September 30, 2019 -- half of the pit bull ban time period -- there were a total of 319 dog bites and attacks on people and other animals. 116 were attributed to pit bulls and pit bull mixes, 36%.
In the four years leading up to the ban, from 2000 through 2003, there were 71 bites or attacks involving pit bulls; an average of 17.8 per year. During the ban years, the average was 2.3. Back in 2013, now retired Pawtucket Animal Control Officer John Holmes, a key proponent of the ban, said the numbers "speak for themselves." Today, the annual rate of pit bull attacks is 23.2, more than 10 times higher than during the ban years and even higher than the pre-ban years.
Local Leaders Still in Office
Pawtucket city leaders strongly supported the pit bull ban. Mayor Donald Grebien and City Council President David Moran wrote a joint letter to Governor Lincoln Chafee just days before he signed the bill asking that he veto the legislation. The city even tried to get a bill passed in the state legislature in 2015 that would have preserved pit bull ordinances that were in place prior to the legislature passing the state preemption law. Both Grebien and Moran remain in office today.
The sharp rise in pit bull incidents following the ban being overturned -- again, the annual number of attacks today is over 10 times higher than during the ban years and even higher than the pre-ban years -- shows what happens when state legislators cater to special-interest groups instead of protecting public safety. "It should be left to local officials to do what is necessary to protect humans and the animals in their particular cities and towns," stated Grebien and Moran's letter.
In 2016, city leaders renewed their criticism of state lawmakers for passing the preemption bill after a pit bull-boxer mix named "Chance" killed a small dog. The pit bull busted through a screen door to reach the dog. The owner of the Maltese named "Muffin" said, "[Chance] slaughtered my dog in my arms." Council President Moran said afterward that he continues to be "disgusted" by what state lawmakers did to overturn Pawtucket's successful pit bull ban, calling it an "atrocity."
The Iconic John Holmes
Veteran animal control officer John Holmes is an icon from an earlier era. When he retired in 2015, after 40 years of public service, Mayor Donald Grebien declared the entrance into the Pawtucket Animal Shelter to be labeled "John Holmes Way." Under his direction, the shelter increased public safety and dramatically reduced euthanasia. City Councilor John Barry said the shelter became a "model for the state" under his direction. Holmes' departure left a "great hole," Barry said.
During his farewell ceremony, Holmes said, "It's a whole different world" in animal control today. Every potential adoptive family is screened and landlords are consulted. Pet adoptions come with a more rigorous process than ever, he said, as officers check to make sure animals are going to the right families, reported The Valley Breeze. Holmes was proud to have a "no-kill" shelter, but did so under a public safety priority. Today, many no-kill shelters have no screening process at all.
After a recent pit bull adoption disaster from a county no-kill shelter in Ohio, the adopter told us, "The [shelter staff] didn't ask us for much information. They just handed over not only what is possibly a dangerous creature to us without proper vetting, but let's not forget they did not even do the minimal due diligence to ensure they were giving the animal to somebody who could love it instead of an impulse purchaser who would grow bored or some sort of animal hoarder."
John Holmes Over the Years
- (2009) - John Holmes, Pawtucket's veteran animal control officer, says he predicted that it would take two years for Pawtucket to experience the full benefit of the pit bull ban after it was passed, but the results were actually apparent in half the time. "It's working absolutely fantastic," said Holmes. "We have not had a pit bull maiming in the city since December of 2004."2
- (2010) - The Pawtucket Animal Shelter remains a staunch "no kill" facility, said Holmes. Workers absolutely will not put down a dog because of its breed, he added, and every possible measure to rehabilitate a vicious dog is taken before euthanasia is considered. "We profile the pit bulls first, spay and neuter, and then work with people to get them adopted" outside of the city.3
- (2013) - Holmes said the numbers before and after 2004 "speak for themselves" ... "The law's worked. We didn't put this law in to destroy pit bulls, in fact, quite the opposite" ... The last serious pit bull attack in Pawtucket was the day the pit bull ban was signed into law. Residents have been safer because of the ban, Holmes said. "Public safety has always been the issue."4
- (2013) Holmes says state lawmakers won't be doing the dogs any favors if they prohibit cities from enforcing local bans on pit bulls ... "This was a tool to keep the dogs from being abused and to keep them out of the wrong hands," says Holmes. "Now if this law comes to pass I'm afraid we're going to go backwards. We're going to see more pit bulls and we're going to have more euthanizations."5
- (2014) Holmes said Monday that "time will tell" if the reversal of the ban will take the city back to the days of more attacks and more pit bulls being put down. He said he feels like the city has "gone 10 years backward," but "the law is the law," and the city will abide by it. Holmes said the pit bull law "was a good ordinance" that he "strongly believed" in. "The record speaks for itself on how the law worked," he said.6
- (2015) - As a key proponent of the city's pit bull ban, Holmes said he acted to protect everyone. While he often took criticism, he "always did things for the safety of animals and people" ... City Councilor John Barry said Holmes was a real leader on the pit bull issue, "holding the council's hand" as he guided members through a very tough implementation of the ban.7
Since the reversal of Pawtucket's pit bull ban five years ago due to the state preemption law, the annual number of attacks inflicted by pit bulls is over 10 times higher. According to local officials, the Pawtucket Animal Shelter has also been routinely full of pit bulls since the ban was lifted. The recent Valley Breeze article did not provide pit bull euthanasia numbers, but typically when the intake of unwanted pit bulls increases at a city shelter, so does the rate of pit bull euthanasia.
Breed-specific legislation like the successful pit bull bans in Pawtucket (2004 to 2013) and Aurora, Colorado (2005 to present day) have dramatically reduced the number of pit bull attacks on people and pets, reduced the overall pit bull population in those communities, reduced the intake of unwanted pit bulls at the city shelter and dramatically reduced pit bull euthanasia.8 In 2014, Aurora reported a 93% reduction in pit bull euthanasia in the nine years after adopting their pit bull ban.
Under new leadership at the Pawtucket shelter, "Bob" the pit bull, who needs a home with no children, is falsely listed as a hound-mix. Such deceit should be banned on John Holmes Way.9
2Russ Olivo, "Police push pit bull law," The Call, June 14, 2009.
3Ethan Shorey, "Pawtucket's controversial pit bull law may be relaxed," The Valley Breeze, July 3, 2010.
4Ethan Shorey, "Bites by pit bulls have dropped dramatically since 2004," The Valley Breeze, September 10, 2013.
5Russ Olivo, "Local ACOs oppose removal of ban on pit bulls," The Call, June 27, 2013.
6Ethan Shorey, "Pit bull owners celebrate end of ban; city officials consider appeal," The Valley Breeze, November 24, 2014.
7Ethan Shorey, "Animal Control Officer Holmes bids farewell," The Valley Breeze, January 20, 2015.
8The ban technically lasted through 2014 while the city tried to the fight the state preemption law in court.
9"Bob" also likes protecting his kennel from potential "stranger danger" so any adopter must keep "Bob" away from the door when guests come over. That should work out nicely for postal carriers.
10/16/19: A Pit Bull Adoption Disaster: Animal Aggression, Anti-Anxiety Medication...
10/28/19: Pit Bulls Lead 'Bite' Counts Across U.S. Cities and Counties
10/14/14: Aurora Citizens: Do Not Rescind Your Successful Pit Bull Ban
09/17/13: Dramatic Decline in Attacks by Pit Bulls Since Pawtucket Adopted Pit Bull Ban
Bob, the “hound”, is unusual in that most hounds have long ears. However, the Norwegian Elkhound has fairly small erect ears. Still, he doesn’t resemble an Elkhound because his muzzle is too broad. In Germany, “hund” means dog. So maybe he’s in Germany?
As we know, this is all nonsense. Why do shelters need to conceal the breed of dog? Would they list a poodle as a pit bull? Would they list a Basset hound as a pit bull? Would they list a Chihuahua as a pit bull? Obviously not.
If the breed of dog must be concealed, why not simply euthanize it? How does one find an appropriate home for a dog when those adopting the dog are wanting a hound and this dog is clearly not a hound.
I had tenants moving in years ago with reportedly two “mixed breed” dogs which were actually pit bulls. The male was extremely vicious.
Even while shipping dogs, the airline agents look at the dogs that are being flown. Otherwise, who knows what would be sent.
Essentially, why is there any need to conceal the breed of dog? Could it be that people don’t want them? Most landlords certainly don’t.
Shelters everywhere are full of Bob the hounds. Falsely identified dogs with severe behavior issues. No sane person would adopt these type of animals. And adoption really does not save them anyway. They are what they are. They live aggressively and die aggressively, hopefully without injuring or killing too many innocent victims in the process. Shelters, rescue groups and owners must all be held liable for damages caused by these Bob’s.
Two words: Shelters lie. That’s all you need to know.
I do have a problem with this shelter and Mr. Holmes in that they pawned the pits off to other communities as part of their no-kill paradigm. Their now-defunct legislation was better than most of us could expect but this was passing off dangerous dogs to someone else’s community. I would love to see communities dog wardens and shelters have a strict humane euthanasia policy for pit bulls and other aggressive breeds. Putting even the “good” ones out into the community increases risk by increasing the desirability of these dogs to others who may have a good experience. It creates pit bull advocates and lovers.
Facebook from Pawsitive Warriors Rescue, where on Monday , a pit bull attacked and severely injured 3 humans, one got a copter ride to the hospital.
These photos terrify me.
The uneducated and/or uncaring staff /volunteers who put the gladiator dogs in dangerous/ potentially deadly situations should be banned from any dog contact or ownership for life.
So who really benefits from ending pit bull bans? The public doesn’t, the shelters are glutted, and the dogs that languish in them don’t. The only beneficiaries I can see are the least deserving- pit bull rescues, breeders and lobbiers. In other words, the parties causing the problems in the first place.
And what are we to do about this problem? Well, it’s a matter of cutting off the money supply.
Stop donating to rescue groups that promote pit bulls. And that may include your local humane society. Donate to this website instead.
Hold your local animal control agency accountable. Demand to know how your tax dollars are being spend. Get the media on your side. Investigative reporting is what they do.
And the breeders? They probably don’t have business licenses. Doubtful that they’re paying taxes. You can report them to your local authorities and to the IRS.