Please donate to support our work is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt public charity organization. Learn more »

4 thoughts on “London Pianist and Toddler Attacked by a Pair of Pit Bulls

Please review our comment policy.

  1. I live near Plumstead Common, and like this unfortunate woman, I also have a toddler with whom I enjoy spending time in the open spaces of the common. Until the man responsible for the attack is apprehended, I will not feel comfortable taking my daughter there. I hate to think what might have happened if the child had started to cry and attracted the dogs’ attention.

    I am deeply concerned and angry about this incident. I see many “pitbull” owners in this part of southeast London who do not adequately control their dogs, do not clean up after them, and clearly do not treat them in a way that makes them gentle, or more importantly, predictable, animals.

    I realise that not all owners of this type of dog are irresponsible, but too many are, and they give all dog owners a bad name. There needs to be more policing of the laws pertaining to dogs in the borough – then maybe tragic incidents like this most recent one can be prevented.

    My thoughts are with Ms. Duella and her family. Best wishes for a speedy recovery.

  2. I thought pit bulls were banned in the UK. I guess everyone registers their pit bull as a Staffordshire terrier?

  3. The thing is, Staffordshire terriers are pit bulls. How on earth were they not included in the definition, and for what purpose were they not included? I think the first poster makes it very clear that regular people do not have the freedoms they should because of one type of dog. It doesn’t matter where you live – England, America, Australia – this same scenario of innocent people being attacked and more people afraid that their children will be the next victim is playing out all over the place. I share their frustration.

  4. I notice in the comments section in that article that there may be some reluctance to pick up pit bulls by the police in the U.K. because some groups are calling breeding/fighting the dogs “part of a certain culture.”

    This is a fake ploy that dogfighters have tried to use in the U.S. to oppose anti-dogfighting laws and anti-chaining laws- by claiming these things are part of their “culture.”

    Sort of a cheap trick like claiming religious exclusion.

    The sick thing is when some legislator starts parrotting the dog fighters and defending their “culture.” I guess that also means the drugs, gun running, and tax evasion too.

Comments are closed.