Compelling Testimony by Representatives Who Opposed the Bill
Audio from the March 14 House Floor debate regarding HB 1519 in the Arkansas legislature.
Little Rock, AR - On March 14, there was an impressive House Floor debate concerning HB 1519, a bill prohibiting cities and counties in Arkansas from enacting or enforcing breed-specific laws. The legislation, sponsored by Rep. RJ Hawk (R-District 81), was defeated in a 34-45 vote. Representatives who opposed the bill had powerful, compelling arguments. Representatives who supported the bill voiced "well-worn talking points" from the Pit Bull Lobby. They lost the vote.
Further, supporters of the bill during the debate spoke a number of half-truths and untruths. HB 1519 would have eliminated all breed-specific ordinances in Arkansas, not just "breed bans," as they attempted to portray. Hawk even talks about the "capital city's” vicious dog ordinance, but fails to mention that Little Rock has had a breed-specific ordinance in place since 2009 that declares pit bulls "potentially dangerous." His bill would have killed this local ordinance.
Hawk did not have his facts straight about military breed-specific regulations either. He claimed there were none. The truth is, between 2009 and 2012, all three military divisions -- the U.S. Army, U.S. Marine Corps and U.S. Air Force -- banned dangerous dog breeds on bases and privatized housing, primarily: pit bulls, rottweilers and wolf-dog hybrids. These breed restrictions are still intact today and can be verified through the Department of Defense or that military division.
"As to Brown's testimony, said that the military has banned pit bulls. That's completely false. That is completely false!" - Rep. RJ Hawk
Bill supporters also made false claims about the constitutionality of pit bull ordinances. The false claims come just a few months after the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, which governs the state of Arkansas, upheld a city's pit bull ban in November 2022. Further, the city of Maumelle's pit bull ban was upheld by the Supreme Court of Arkansas in 1991. Maumelle city council repealed its ban in April 2021, but not because it was allegedly "unconstitutional."
Rep. Pilkington, who opposed the bill, gave passionate testimony (at 5:57) that included the deaths of two young children, killed by a pair of family pit bulls last October. The family had owned the pit bulls for eight years. Rep. Wooten (at 13:11), corrected another untruth by the bill's supporters, who claimed the bill would only "encourage" cities to adopt breed neutral laws."This [bill] does not encourage [cities] it prohibits" them from having breed-specifics laws, he said.
Rep. Gazaway, a former prosecutor, who opposed the bill (at 17:28), has firsthand experience in prosecuting cases of vicious dog attacks. "Two to one they were pit bulls," Gazaway said. He then proceeded to share a terrifying account of a home-invasion attack by a pit bull: "The pit bull actually left its owner's yard, busted up inside of a person's house and attacked the young boy inside of his own home." The child almost died, "because [the bite] could have severed an artery."
"These breeds are inherently dangerous. They are inherently aggressive. They are by their nature capable of producing fatalities." - Rep. Gazaway
Rep. Brown also shared compelling testimony (at 27:15), including the fatal pit bull mauling of a young boy in Faulkner County in 2020. Robby had gone out to check the mail. When he did not return, his mother began looking for him. "She found his shoes in the driveway, she called 911. His 15-year old sister found his body in the field. He had been mauled to death by two pit bulls," he said. Brown was involved tangentially in the criminal case and would sit in court to watch.
"I had to look at the pictures of this child, this 9-year old boy laying down in the field with his jugular tore out," Brown said. "I had to look at the pictures of him on the medical examiner's table when he had his autopsy," Brown said. "But the most haunting thing I heard was his mother wailing in the courtroom." Having two young children himself, hearing Robby's mother wailing in the courtroom bothered him. "Usually, I am dealing with insurance or banking," Brown said.
Bill Sponsor Closes the Debate
When the debate concluded, Hawk took to the podium again and basically unraveled (at 31:36). In fact, we had to stop the audio at one point in order to make a clarification regarding the former Maumelle pit bull ban. Hawk lashed out at Rep. Pilkington's and Rep. Brown's testimony. Apparently, Hawk had no knowledge of the longstanding military breed-specific regulations on bases and privatized housing. Hawk has only been a state Representative for three months.
We encourage readers to send a thank you message to the Arkansas Representatives who provided powerful testimony in opposition of this bill, including: Rep. Aaron Pilkington, Rep. Jim Wooten, Rep. Jimmy Gazaway and Rep. Matthew Brown. Their email addresses are located on the Legislators List page. It's uncommon to see an assembly of well-versed legislators come together to defeat an anti-BSL preemption bill driven by a "little special interest" group.
"I want prevention. I want to stop this. This is not a solution. So that we can help some little special interest group 'get a win' here..." - Rep. Pilkington
On March 13, the House Committee on City, County and Local Affairs held a hearing for HB 1519. Best Friends Animal Society lobbyist Eric Swafford was the "guest" of Hawk during the hearing.
Left: Rep. Pilkington spoke passionately against the bill. Right: The bill's sponsor, Rep. Hawk.
Several Arkansas Representatives that spoke against HB 1519 during the House Floor debate.
Related articles:
10/11/22: 2022 Double Dog Bite Fatality: Pair of Family Pit Bulls Kill Two Children in Tennessee
01/15/21: 2020 Dog Bite Fatality: 9-Year Old Boy Killed by Two Pit Bulls in Faulkner County
Related materials:
TREND: State Legislators are Largely Rejecting State Preemption Bills that Prohibit Local Governments from Adopting Pit Bull Laws
Colleen, thanks for making it so easy to send thank-you notes to these knowledgeable Arkansas House Representatives. Done!
Your article is simply outstanding. We appreciate your time and energy to create an incisive report. Bravo!
Am sending thank yous now!
Representative Matthew Brown: “To me there’s something fundamentally wrong where the associations that promote pitbulls even warn owners: when you take your dogs out you must take a break stick with you. Because if your dog does snap and latches onto a kid or latches onto another dog you have to have this stick.”
I just watched this on YouTube. The guy pushing for the laws to be changed on breed ownership in housing and for insurance policies compared a chihuahua to a GSD (or other ‘perceived’ dangerous breed.
Well, good for Arkansas!
Will the hammer finally come down for the people responsible for breeding/selling/promoting these dogs with a history of slaughtering other animals and people?
I know it’s been a hot topic lately so maybe BSL will become the norm.
Then all we’ll need is enforcement
Thank you, Colleen. This was fascinating and infuriating at the same time. First of all, comparing banning Germans to banning pitbulls is a specious argument. The usual one is comparing discrimination of Black people to banning pitbulls. (Being that this is the South, for damn good reason, they were careful not to do that.) Black people or Germans or whomever should never be brought into this argument. Comparing human beings to dogs is despicable. Ignorant pit people bring this up a lot as if they’re enlightened by the scourge of racism/discrimination. This debate and outcome gave me hope that maybe we’re on the right track. It seems the Tennessee attack is having an impact. A new book called “Death by Pitbull” has recently come out. The author, a lawyer, was inspired to write it after he learned of the Bernard case. Maybe someday that family will be willing to talk about losing their two babies to their pitbulls. If even ONE child’s life could be saved, it would be worth it for them to do it.
Thank you, Colleen for this article. I will write to the pols and thank them for their work on this bill. I hope to see pit bulls eliminated. Yes, there are some nice ones. I get that. But the breed was created to maim and kill and they are physically suited to that, not to mention the mental aspect. No other breed comes close to their propensity to attack, and the frequency with which they turn on their own families is truly frightening.
I’d love to see them eliminated, too. The point you made about they’re not all bad was likened to the M&M test. If you had a whole bowl of M&M’s and you knew only one was poison, would you take that chance and eat one? Why would someone have an animal in your home that could potentially kill you or your children? That’s always the great mystery to me.
Would be helpfull if we could see a list of political donations to RJ Hawk.
PLEASE, if you email the legislators to thank them, point out that in the 70s Dobermans KILLED NO ONE, maybe a handful in the 80s, and the stats haven’t changed on these dogs since then. There is no “media conspiracy” to demonize pit bull type dogs, the stats simply speak for themselves. This shopworn “first it was the Dobes, then it was the GSDs” pit lobby trope needs to be debunked.
It’s terrible how these elected officials flat out lied in testimony.
Plus there’s a vast difference between “dog bit someone” because there’s a continuum of damage just like “Fella hit someone” well, how badly? Did the fella hospitalize someone, bruise them? Were there stitches? What are the chances he’ll do it again?
VS
Murder. Slaughter. Mauled to bloody ribbons. Tortured to death.
It’s rare that dogs other than pitbulls do the latter. And on those few occasions when they do–nobody gets paid millions of dollars to excuse their behaviour.
Lawyers aren’t lining up with their hands out to save the Killer Poodles.
We have long since reached the point where our ‘elected representatives’ do the bidding of whoever greases their palms the best. Pit advocacy is flush with cash, victim advocacy not so much.
I wasn’t ever going to back down and I presented the statistics to the family friend of Robby Taylor and his mom, and said this is not an isolated incident, let them choose to advocate and they did a really good job, Representative Brown also talks about Levi, my son, because I worked with the Robby Taylor family to aid in any way I could and so did Dennis Baker, we had their back and try to answer any questions they had and if we couldn’t we find the information for their case, and never have let Levi’s case get swept under the rug, and never will. Awareness is my priority and just being there thru their grief. We won’t back down, for so long I was the only one advocating in Arkansas until the Robby Taylor family joined in and we moved mountains that I was shocked and wanting to move for ten years now. I want to say thank you to all the advocates from other states that help me learn how to advocate for BSL and human safety. I love y’all, n we are changing Arkansas one day at a time. This has been a long time coming for me, and for us, we feel like a job well done. Our children are still dead, but this made it a little easier knowing we are saving lives, and making this happen.💯