Letter: Pit Bull Apologists Always Sing the Same Tune

Tired of Distortions
Simi Valley, CA - Upon reading this letter to the editor, one might think DogsBite.org wrote it and submitted it to the Simi Valley Acorn. The author, however, is Marc Atkinson. He too has had enough of the distortions voiced by people like Kathy Jenks, the director of Ventura County Department of Animal Regulation. The pit bull attack that lead to the death of Katya Todesco went unreported to the media for 6 days by Jenks' department and the police.

The question is why?

Statements made by Jenks to several news sources paint her as a "pit bull apologist." As Atkinson points out, many of her statements also defy logic. It's unacceptable that the director of a county department -- whose mission is to protect people and animals -- can freely distort the safety record of the pit bull breed. The only addition we'd like to make about Atkinson's letter is that far more than 25 U.S. cities ban pit bulls. There are nearly 20 cities in the state of Kansas alone.

Pit Bull Apologists Always Sing the Same Tune
Marc Atkinson, Simi Valley Acorn
October 17, 2008
"I'm deeply saddened by the tragic death of yet another innocent child, Katya Todesco, due to what should be defined as an act of domestic terrorism, perpetrated by the dog's owner. As a father of two children, and a responsible owner of two dogs, I know both sides of this sad story. Yet the story is nearly always the same with a pit bull attack: a child attacked, sometimes killed; a funeral with a small casket is held, and the owners walk free, perplexed at how their "good dog" could have done such a thing.
Then it's the usual defenders like Kathy Jenks employing distorted logic to claim that pit bulls are no more dangerous than any other dog, which anyone with two eyes and one ounce of common sense knows is absurd. She cites Labrador retrievers as one of the "biters" in a dog bite study, which is false logic, since Labs are America's most popular dog. But Labs aren't known for killing people; pit bulls are, and the facts support this. In fact, a University of Minnesota study of 19 years listed human deaths from pit bulls at 66, Rottweilers at 39. Labradors and Chihuahuas somehow escaped the study as killers.
The Clifton study, performed over 24 years, lists pit bulls 5,500 percent more likely to kill a human than a Labrador. Coincidentally, no insurance company will insure a homeowner with either a pit bull or a Rottweiler. Also, the pit bull breed has been banned outright in 25 U.S. cities so far, and six countries and many other major foreign cities, for good reason: The breed is a menace that has no place in our communities and should be banned nationally. But if we refuse to protect our kids from these dangerous animals, at the very least manslaughter charges should be brought against pit bull owners whose dogs kill."

5 thoughts on “Letter: Pit Bull Apologists Always Sing the Same Tune”

Logic like this is a breath of fresh air!

Here’s a Jenks A/C breakdown which resulted in 4 people being wounded, 2 dogs and a cat killed!

“We are not monsters. We were trying to help an animal that couldn’t get placed,” said C.C. Ebert, who adopted the pit bull from the Ventura County Animal Shelter in August.

The dog, which had come to the shelter as a stray, had passed a temperament test, according to Kathy Jenks, director of Ventura County Animal Regulation. Blue’s ears, however, were cropped in a style associated with fighting dogs”
http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2007/may/06/pit-bull-attacks-lead-to-investigation-someone/

This is why temperment tests mean squat and every pit suspected of being used or bred for fighting should be put down. You would think that those who claim to love the breed would be calling for the same as it would clean up the gene pool while making them seem concerned for the public’s welfare. But their solution is to continue to allow the maulings but bully the media into not reporting it anymore so no one knows it is happening.

I think the public has to push for more information on pit bull attack stories, and shine a spotlight on the “rescuers” who place these ticking time bombs in our neighborhoods. Public scorn, more scrutiny, and possible legal liability will help discourage the pit bull fanatics, who currently walk away scott free after a tragedy.

Jenks and the shelter should be sued.

This is probably the only thing that will prevent more deaths and maulings, as they seem to feel they have the right to hand out dangerous dogs.

Comments are closed.

Please review our comment policy.

bluesmom on October 18, 2008 at 9:02 pm said:
Logic like this is a breath of fresh air!
Anonymous on October 18, 2008 at 10:06 pm said:
Here’s a Jenks A/C breakdown which resulted in 4 people being wounded, 2 dogs and a cat killed!
“We are not monsters. We were trying to help an animal that couldn’t get placed,” said C.C. Ebert, who adopted the pit bull from the Ventura County Animal Shelter in August.
The dog, which had come to the shelter as a stray, had passed a temperament test, according to Kathy Jenks, director of Ventura County Animal Regulation. Blue’s ears, however, were cropped in a style associated with fighting dogs”
http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2007/may/06/pit-bull-attacks-lead-to-investigation-someone/
Jersey on October 18, 2008 at 11:48 pm said:
This is why temperment tests mean squat and every pit suspected of being used or bred for fighting should be put down. You would think that those who claim to love the breed would be calling for the same as it would clean up the gene pool while making them seem concerned for the public’s welfare. But their solution is to continue to allow the maulings but bully the media into not reporting it anymore so no one knows it is happening.
Anonymous on October 19, 2008 at 12:30 am said:
I think the public has to push for more information on pit bull attack stories, and shine a spotlight on the “rescuers” who place these ticking time bombs in our neighborhoods. Public scorn, more scrutiny, and possible legal liability will help discourage the pit bull fanatics, who currently walk away scott free after a tragedy.
Anonymous on October 22, 2008 at 5:36 am said:
Jenks and the shelter should be sued.
This is probably the only thing that will prevent more deaths and maulings, as they seem to feel they have the right to hand out dangerous dogs.

Please donate to support our work

5 thoughts on “Letter: Pit Bull Apologists Always Sing the Same Tune”