Thursday, November 20, 2008
Orange County, NC - After nearly two years and one major scandal, Orange County finally passed an anti-tethering law. Pit bull breeders have substantial pull in the county. Tom Garner, a well-known breeder of pit bulls, who was convicted of dogfighting in 1985, lives in area. As you can see from his property, Garner will now have to cease chaining his pit bulls.
When Orange County created a citizens' committee to study an anti-tethering ordinance, a woman named Alane Koki applied to become a member. She submitted a 13-page resume citing numerous accomplishments as a scientist and medical researcher: a doctorate in zoology, a dozen patents, and publication in more than 50 journals. Koki seemed a fine appointee for the seat designated for an "animal wellness/health expert." She was placed on the panel on February 6th, 2007.
Breeders of pit bulls oppose anti-tethering laws and all laws designed to regulate pit bulls. One might think that "good" breeders would endorse mandatory spay/neuter laws to stop backyard breeding, but they do not.What Koki failed to list in her application was her long history of breeding pit bulls in other states and her association with local kennel owner Tom Garner, whom commissioners declined to appoint to the committee the same night they approved Koki. As details emerged about Koki's background, however, officials worried that her membership on the committee was an attempt to scuttle any potential limitations on tethering -- a common practice used by breeders and trainers of fighting dogs.
Orange County Commissioner Mike Nelson said, "There's so much money in dogfighting, now that I look back with 20/20 hindsight, I shouldn't be surprised that the dogfighting lobby would go to lengths like this -- they have a lot to lose." Web sites for Tom Garner Kennels and Koki's Thundermaker Bulldogs showed several examples of offspring resulting from breeding their dogs to each other. Garner, however, denied having any business relationship with Koki, including that he ever bred his dogs to hers.
"On archived versions of the Thundermaker Bulldogs Web site, which include a picture of Koki cuddling a dog, descriptions of individual pit bulls detail bloodlines for several generations. For example, one Thundermaker "stud" listed in 2001 named "Goodson's Dozerboy" lists Garner's dog, "Garner's Frisco" as his sire and "Garner's Ch Chinaman" as his grandsire. Asked about those bloodline connections, Garner says he "is unaware of [Koki] having a Web site." The only connection he has with Koki, he says, centers on a study she's conducting about the effects of tethering on dogs."The scandal also uncovered additional aspects of Koki:
- Koki had been investigated for being involved in breeding dogs for fighting. On July 7, 2006, authorities in Dane County, WI, taped a conversation between Koki and a man named Robert Lowery, a former sheriff's deputy accused of dogfighting and drug trafficking. A transcript of the conversation was introduced as evidence in Lowery's trial.
- Pennsylvania officials had been investigating Koki for nearly a year, after discovering about 50 pit bulls on her property in Mohrsville, PA, according to Harry Brown, responsible for animal control in the county. Koki did not have the license required to keep more than 26 dogs, and several months into the investigation, most of her dogs were removed.
- It was also unclear whether Koki actually lived in Orange County (a requirement for serving on the study committee). She listed a home phone in Pennsylvania on her resume and she was not registered to vote in North Carolina, though she offered a street address of 215 Ashe St. in Hillsborough, a house in a run-down neighborhood surrounded by a privacy fence.
11/16/08: Massive Dogfighting Sting in Harris County, Texas
10/31/08: Coverage of the Fulton County Animal Shelter - DogsBite.org
Labels: North Carolina
Please donate to support our work
DogsBite.org is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt public charity organization. Learn more »
| 11/20/2008 2:32 AM |
All of us need to take a good hard look at our local animal control committees, shelter boards of directors and staff, legislators to determine if dogfighters and breeders have infiltrated and are opposing laws (or not enforcing laws) on behalf of their business interests.
There are more of these people out there who haven't been detected yet!
| 11/20/2008 1:07 PM |
The bizarro mindset of pit breeders amazes me.
Responsible breeders of other dog focus on the happiness and well being of the canine, and truly 'love the breed', pitties churn out the most miserable creatures into the most miserable lives, their 'love for the breed' means 'love for their own ego' which is stuck in the terrible twos.
| 11/20/2008 1:07 PM |
Another story on this http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A88915
This is how many of these breeders and dog fighters infiltrate.
They try to claim they are "experts" and toss around their college degrees to try to impress.
You'll see them writing papers that pile up all kinds of statistics and "scientific evauluations" that support breeders' claims or positions.
Since college degrees, law licenses, and other "credentials" are a dime a dozen these days, it's all meaningless.
And if you did deeper into these things, all their "proofs" are a house of cards that easily tumbles.
And there are many vets, scientists, and the like who work for or in the dog breeding, dog fighting, puppy mill, whatever world!
A degree or a license doesn't mean a person is honest or ethical.
Business lobbies like the tobacco industry, liquor industry, drugs manufacturers, etc have been using these pseudo "experts" or "experts for hire" to manipulate authorities for a long time, and the dog breeder industry does it too.
Some people in city or town governments are very susceptible to these games and are easily awed and tricked.
| 11/20/2008 2:45 PM |
"Responsible breeders of other dog focus on the happiness and well being of the canine, and truly 'love the breed',"
Sorry, I can't agree.
The AKC makes most of its money from puppy mill registrations, and its "responsible" breeders are busy lobbying FOR the mills on behalf of the AKC (and also against bsl)
and "responsible" breeders are right in there with the dog fighting and breeding lunatics opposing any kind of law that affects breeders, to the point that they are supporting animal abuse
The "responsible" dog breeding world just isn't
| 11/20/2008 2:51 PM |
More on Koki
"There is other evidence that Koki may be involved in breeding dogs for fighting. On July 7, 2006, authorities in Dane County, Wis., taped a conversation between Koki and a man named Robert Lowery, a former sheriff's deputy accused of dog-fighting and drug trafficking. A transcript of the conversation was introduced as evidence in Lowery's trial.
"Does Jeff still have that Lucky dog?" Lowery asked Koki over a recorded jail phone line.
"No ... it lost again," she responds.
Koki also tried to gain possession of Lowery's pit bulls, which were seized and held at the Dane County Humane Society. Koki visited the shelter twice to try to convince the staff to turn the dogs over to her, says Dave Madden, the animal care director."
| 11/21/2008 2:34 AM |
"The girl at our shelter said she has a pit bull and they are the most wonderful dogs. "
Lots of adult little girls have pit bulls.
They have no clue about how to handle them or about the problems.
Then the pit bulls bite or kill someone or their pet.
Then the little girls blame the victim.