Denver dog bite statistics over a three year period: 2017, 2018 and 2019.
UPDATE: On February 24, the attempt to overturn Mayor Michael Hancock's veto of the pit bull ban repeal failed in an 8 to 5 vote. Nine votes were needed to overcome the veto. The repeal's sponsor, Councilman Chris Herndon, will now try to place the initiative on the November ballot.
Denver, CO - On February 24, Denver City Council members will determine if they can override the mayor's veto of the pit bull ban repeal. Nine votes are required to overrule the veto. On February 14, Mayor Michael Hancock vetoed the legislation, slowing the rushed repeal effort. The proposed repeal, sponsored by City Councilman Chris Herndon, would have rescinded the city's 30-year old pit bull ban and allowed ownership of pit bulls under a "breed-restricted license."
Last week, we obtained Denver dog bite statistical data by breed and injury severity over a 3-year period through a public records request. The data shows that across all four injury severity categories, Levels 2, 3, 4 and 5, pit bulls are among the top six biting breeds. Despite their low population in Denver, pit bulls are also among the top three biting breeds for Level 4 and 5 bites, 5 being the most severe, and classified by a recent scientific medical study as a "mauling injury."1
Denver's Dog Bite Injury Scale
- Level 2: Contact with the skin without puncture, or, at most, a shallow puncture with slight bleeding.
- Level 3: One to four punctures from a single bite, with no puncture deeper than half of the dog's canine tooth. There may be a laceration from the dog or person pulling away.
- Level 4: One to four punctures from a single bite with at least one being deeper than half the length of the dog's canine tooth. May include bruising if dog bore down, and may include lacerations in more than one direction.
- Level 5: Multiple bites with at least two Level 4 bites.
- See the related Ian Dunbar Bite Scale
Due to the fluctuation in the number of dog bites annually, we combined three years of data to analyze. There were a total of 704 biting incidents in 2017, 495 biting incidents in 2018 and 518 biting incidents in 2019. The combined total for the period was 1717 bites. Our main concern is the Level 3 to 5 bites. In the Level 3 bite category, pit bulls were the top fourth biting breed, inflicting 29 of these bites. The top most biter, Labrador retrievers, were responsible for 61 bites.
In the Level 4 bite category, pit bulls ranked third among the top biting breeds in Denver, inflicting 19 bites, surpassed by Labrador retrievers (25) and American bulldogs (21), a close cousin of the pit bull. Pit bulls even had more Level 4 bites than German shepherds. In the Level 5 bite category, pit bulls tied with boxers for second among the top biting breeds. Both breeds inflicted 5 of these severe bites, surpassed only by the American bulldog, which accounted for 8 bites.
Pit bulls have a small population in Denver because of the longstanding ban, but this did not stop them from achieving the title of a top biting breed. Last year in Kansas City, Missouri, which has a mandatory pit bull sterilization law, pit bulls still inflicted over four times more bites than any other breed. More ominously, five years after Pawtucket, Rhode Island was forced to lift its pit bull ban due to a state preemption law, annual bites by pit bulls increased by more than 10 times.
This is what Denver can expect to see if their ban is repealed, at least a 4-fold increase in pit bull bites across all injury levels in just 5 years.
Page two of our analysis shows Level 2 bites and bites with an unknown level of injury severity. Pit bulls rank within the top six biting breeds in both categories. In Denver, where pit bulls are banned, the breed even has a presence in the lowest bite level, inflicting 9% (35) among the top biting breeds. All common biting breeds outpaced pit bulls, including chihuahuas, Labrador retrievers and German shepherds. Pit bulls rank fourth in the unknown injury severity category as well.
The All Data Summary shows top biting breeds versus all other dog breeds combined. Of the total number of bites, 1717, pit bulls inflicted 5% of all Level 2 bites, 6% of Level 3 bites, 12% of Level 4 bites and 12% of Level 5 bites. About a quarter of all reported dog bites in Denver have unknown injury severity. Among the top biting breeds, only 8% (25) of bites by pit bulls had unknown injury severity, surpassed by both Labrador retrievers 13% (39) and German shepherds 11% (33).
Pit Bulls Routinely Lead Bites
Since 2013, pit bulls have led all biting incidents in jurisdictions in 19 states. From Louisville, Kentucky, where pit bulls inflicted nearly 3 times more bites than all other breeds, to Sacramento, California, where pit bulls inflicted over one-third of all bites, 4 times more than any other breed, to New York City, where pit bulls inflicted nearly 7 times more bites than the next closest breed, and to Gulfport, Mississippi, where pit bulls inflicted 10 times more bites than any other dog breed.
Most of the jurisdictions in our national bite report do not have breed-specific laws, but some do, including Kansas City and San Bernardino County, California, both of which have mandatory pit bull sterilization laws. Pit bulls are still the leading biters in both places. As Denver bite statistics show, pit bulls only need a small population to appear among the top biting breeds in a city or county. Only a small population is needed to appear in the most severe injury categories too.
Our analysis of Denver dog bite statistics is three years combined. So a 4-fold increase in Level 4 bites by pit bulls in a single year would move from 9 to 36 bites, obliterating the other top biting breeds in that category. Despite the modest enforcement of the Denver's ban, it is still preventing Level 4 and 5 bites by pit bulls and death. One motto for the public health industry is, "Laws can have a beneficial effect, even when there is little enforcement and some people flout the law."2
A Note on Top Biting Breeds
Similar to dog bite fatalities, where a small group of dog breeds inflict the vast majority of attacks, top biting breeds by far inflict more bites than other breeds. The 2019 dog bite chart from Kansas City clearly shows this. One sees 5 breeds (each inflicting 10 or more bites) producing a combined 234 bites, which is 70% of the total recorded dog bites (336), compared to 40 other dog breeds inflicting 9 and fewer bites each. It is statistically reasonable to focus on the top biting breeds.
The popularity of a dog breed within a community also plays a role in top biting breeds. In Denver, like in many other cities, Labrador retrievers and German shepherds are among the most popular dog breeds. As we see in Denver's dog bite statistics, function also plays a role. Fighting and baiting breeds like the American bulldog and pit bull terrier, show up disproportionately to their population numbers, likewise as do the robust herding breeds, like the Australian cattle dog.
San Francisco Dog Bite Statistics by Breed, Severity, Gender and Reproductive Status Over a Five Year Period (2014-2018)
In 2005, San Francisco became the first city to enact a mandatory pit bull sterilization law. In January 2019, we obtained five years of dog bite statistics from the city (2014-2018). California state law requires cities with breed-specific laws to track injury severity and reproductive status for all dog bites. The caveat of San Francisco's data is that it combines bites on humans and pets -- the two are indistinguishable. The city also has an inordinately high chihuahua population.
San Francisco tracks injury severity in five levels, similar to Denver, but with different names and definitions. As our focus on Denver concentrated on the more severe bites, we examined Level 3 Multiple Bites and Level 4 Mauling events in the San Francisco data. Pit bulls inflicted 46% (149 of 326) of injuries in this combined injury category, over twice the rate of any other top biting breed and over twice the rate of all other breeds combined, which includes 135 different dog breeds.
San Francisco Dog Bite Injury Scale
- 0 Single Nip: Tooth contact on skin, puncture with possible bruising or skin scrapes due to lateral movement of teeth against the skin
- 1 Single Bite: Single puncture with quick release. Possible bruising.
- 2 Prolonged Bite: Single puncture with long release. Possible bruising. Possible laceration in one direction cause by pulling away, gravity.
- 3 Multiple Bites: Multiple punctures. Punctures may be shallower than half length of canine teeth or deeper than the length of canine teeth or with slashes in both directions. Possible sutures. Bruising displays instantly. Depth indicates clamping down, slashes indicate grab-and-shake actions. Victim possibly hospitalized.
- 4 Mauling: Multiple punctures or attack incidents. Punctures may be shallower than half length of canine teeth or deeper than the length of canine teeth or with slashes in both directions. Possible sutures. Bruising displays instantly. Depth indicates clamping down, slashes indicate grab-and-shake actions. Victim hospitalized or killed.
Page one shows the top biting breeds in all five bite levels. Noticeable right away is the large volume of chihuahua bites. Chihuahuas make up over one-third of all bites to humans and pets in the city and no doubt are highly popular. Chihuahuas, the "purse dog," have long had an extremely high population in California, so much so that even Hollister, 90 miles south of San Francisco, mandates the sterilization of pit bulls and chihuahuas to reduce their breeding.
Predictably, chihuahuas make up the bulk of the Level 0 and 1 bite categories combined, 39% (1,024 of 2,607). Pit bulls followed with 15% (393). Chihuahuas take a nosedive in the 2 Prolonged Bite category and dive even further as injury severity increases. Pit bulls lead all other breeds in Level 3 Multiple Bites, inflicting nearly 6 times more bites than German shepherds. In Level 4 Mauling injuries, pit bulls inflicted bites 9 times more frequently than Labrador retrievers.
Page two shows data of the reproductive status among biters, which is neutered, spayed and male and female unsterilized. Neutered dogs inflicted 55% of all dog bites to humans and pets. This held true, on average, across all injury severity levels too. In San Francisco, one is more likely to be bitten by a neutered dog than any other type. Neutered and spayed dogs combined inflicted 69% (162 of 236) of Level 3 Multiple Bites and 83% (75 of 90) of Level 4 Mauling events.
Page three shows the reproductive status broken down by the top four biting breeds. Here one can see the exceedingly high number of neutered, biting chihuahuas, making up 91% of all chihuahua bites -- 91%. The other three top biting breeds, pit bulls, German shepherds and Labrador retrievers have a more normalized biting ratio with 61% of biting pit bulls sterilized, 49% of biting German shepherds sterilized and 52.5% of biting Labrador retrievers sterilized.
As Denver dog bite statistics show, pit bulls only need a small population to rise to a top biting breed in a large city. Pit bulls already rank forth in Level 3 bites, third in Level 4 bites and rank second in Level 5 maulings, surpassed only by another pit bull-type, the American bulldog. Lifting the Denver ban, with or without a sterilization requirement, could result in a 4 or 5-fold increase in Level 3, 4 and 5 bite injuries in just five years. The citizens of Denver deserve better than that.
As statistics from San Francisco show, a mandatory pit bull sterilization law is not nearly as effective in reducing serious injuries as a ban. Pit bulls comprise 46% of attacks involving the most serious injuries in San Francisco, but only comprise 12% of these injuries in Denver. Even an imperfect pit bull ban with modest enforcement is better than no ban at all. Because, "laws can have a beneficial effect, even when there is little enforcement and some people flout the law."
Councilman Herndon has billed his repeal ordinance as a "compromise," but a compromise must involve two sides, victims of pit bull attacks and pit bull owners. The repeal legislation has no protections for victims whatsoever. The majority of pit bull owners are either uninsured renters or have a homeowner's policy that excludes pit bulls. Victims of pit bull attacks will not have access to civil recourse. A mandatory insurance requirement of $300,000 is the only true "compromise."
Without mandatory insurance, as was required under Denver's ordinance when existing pit bulls were grandfathered in back in 1989, few of these victims will be compensated for their injuries. It is clear that Herndon has no interest in the rights of pit bull mauling victims. His sole agenda is promoting the interests of pit bull owners over the health and safety of the Denver public and their pets. Some of these pets will be the first to suffer death inflicted by pit bulls under his repeal.
2David Hemenway, While We Were Sleeping, Success Stories in Injury and Violence Prevention, University of California Press, 2009 (Pg. 10).
The mayor's veto will stand. Council needed 9 votes to override. The vote was 8-5. The pit bull ban in #Denver will stay in place.
— Denver City Council (@DenCityCouncil) February 25, 2020
02/17/20: Mayor of Denver Vetoes Pit Bull Ban Repeal Legislation, Slowing the Hasty Repeal
02/17/20: Pit Bulls Lead 'Bite' Counts Across U.S. Cities and Counties - DogsBite.org
Thank you, Colleen, for doing the work to bring this statistical reality to the attention of all who live with this ever-present life-destructive threat.
I wonder how many of these *Labrador Retrievers* and *American Bulldogs* in Denver are pit mixes.
Probably a lot. I worked in an animal hospital for a time and was appalled to see how many people used lab mix or the lab/boxer mix label on dogs who clearly looked like pits. And, many of the reception, techs, and docs facilitated those lies. Some even encouraged it. Every time a little dog came in with a dog attack, it was a pit who had done it.
My thoughts exactly. People are encouraged to lie about their dogs’ true breed to get into housing or in order to avoid a ban. I feel badly for how much Labs as a breed are maligned due to mislabeling. Just look at most shelters these days which call pit mixes or even full blooded pits “Lab mix” and we can see that the data is skewed. Something telling though… a young cousin of mine was bitten in the face by a neighbor’s dog a few years ago. At first, people said it was a pit bull which bit him, and on hearing this everyone was concerned that he would require extensive repair and surgery. Then an update from the hospital: he was bitten by a Lab. The neighbors had two dogs, a Lab and a pit, and indeed in this case it was the Lab which bit him. Every family member sighed in relief upon hearing that because they all knew that it was not as likely to be a disfiguring injury. Everyone was relieved, even those who say pits don’t bite more than any other breed. It’s because everyone inherintly knows that a child bitten in the face by a Lab may come away with scars and trauma, but a child bitten in the face by a pit bull may no longer have ears, eyes, lips, a nose, cheeks or a scalp. That’s one reason I’m glad that bite severity comes into these studies.
I thought the mayors reason for vetoing the bill was compelling. The new pit bull ordinance would require licensing at minimum. Only 20% of ALL Denver dog owners bother to license their dogs, what hope is there that pit bull owners will exceed that? Insurance is a pipe dream. I hope they keep the ban.
Kansas City can add an Australian Shepard who bit me at the dog park ,leaving permanent scaring and bruising. Funny there are no setters on there. I live here in KCMO and there are a ton of pitbulls, and there are an awful lot of pit puppies here in my apartment complex, as we have NO breed restrictions. I didn’t know there was a mandatory sterilization law.
Aren’t American Bulldogs just big pit bulls?
Disappointed they are not part of the ban. If it meant sparing the dog it would not be hard to find a vet tech willing to say your pit was actually an American Bulldog.
Notice if you add Am Bull’s bites to pit bulls they become the number 1 biter in all categories? Am Bulls are number one in level 5 bites already. This again leads me to believe that Am Bulls are big pits.
Great work here on compiling and analyzing the statistics! Thank you.
For the record, in light of the discussion of American bulldogs, here is the definition for “pit bull” used in San Francisco’s Pit Bull Ordinance:
(a) Definition. For the purposes of this Article, the word “pit bull” includes any dog that is an American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any dog displaying the physical traits of any one or more of the above breeds, or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics that conform to the standards established by the American Kennel Club (“AKC”) or United Kennel Club (“UKC”) for any of the above breeds. The AKC and UKC standards for the above breeds are listed on their websites as well as online through the Animal Care and Control Department’s (“Department”) website.
(b) Determination of Breed. If an owner, guardian or keeper is unsure as to whether or not his/her unspayed and unneutered dog is a pit bull, s/he may make an appointment with the Department at which a Department staff member shall make a determination as to whether or not the dog is a pit bull. If the dog owner, guardian or keeper wishes to appeal the determination that the dog is a pit bull, within five business days of the staff member’s determination s/he may request a hearing before the Department’s Director or his/her designee. The hearing shall be held no more than 30 days after the Director receives the request. The hearing may be informal and rules of evidence not strictly observed. The decision of the Director or his/her designee is final.
Thank you for compiling all of this important data. This needs to be widely shared, especially to the Denver citizens. They don’t realize what could happen if they actually end up repealing this ban. They’re opening themselves up to more attacks in even greater severity.
And as early post brought up, I don’t doubt that many dogs listed as labs are actually pit mixes (if not full blooded bully breeds). So the percentages of attacks could very much be higher than we think.
Good God, what is wrong with Councilman Chris Herndon? Supposedly he has a business background but he does not understand simple statistics. His district includes Park Hill, Stapleton, and portions of East Colfax, and Montbello. Notably, Montebello is the district where the community delivered a petition to the mayor hoping he would not repeal the ban. Councilman Herndon represents this district that is poor and black and already has problems with hundreds of pit bulls there and laws not being followed.
He’s taking money from dogfighters and lobbyists, like all pro-pit politicians do.
mayfair park. denver. 2014-2019.
ONE OFF-LEASH VIOLATION ISSUED FOR
5 YEAR PERIOD IN THIS PARK.
PARK DEPT. DATA.
TYPICAL THROUGHOUT CITY.
LACK OF ENFORCEMENT IS MAJOR FACTOR IN CONTINUING VIOLATIONS.
THE BITING CONTINUES!