Monday, July 9, 2012
Canada - Last week, the National Post published an article about a new Canadian dog bite injury study by University of Manitoba-affiliated authors that shows that breed-specific pit bull laws lowered the overall rate at which people were hospitalized with serious dog bite injuries over a 22-year period. The study focuses on the province of Manitoba and jurisdictions within it that banned pit bull-type dogs and jurisdictions that did not from the years 1984 to 2006.
Effectiveness of Breed-Specific Legislation in Decreasing the Incidence of Dog-Bite Injury Hospitalisations in People in the Canadian Province of Manitoba
Background: The city of Winnipeg was the first among several jurisdictions in Manitoba, Canada, to introduce breed specific legislation (BSL) by banning pit-bull type dogs in 1990. The objective of the present work was to study the effectiveness of BSL in Manitoba.Two key tables within the study illustrate the lowering of hospitalizations for serious dog bite injuries by comparing the pre-implementation and post-implementation period of pit bull bans in Manitoba. For instance, Table 3 depicts all Manitoba jurisdictions combined in the years 1984 to 2006, which showed an -18.1% change in hospitalization incident rate and jurisdictions that implemented BSL sometime during the same years showed a -21.5% change in incident rate.
Methods: Temporal differences in incidence of dog-bite injury hospitalisations (DBIH) within and across Manitoba jurisdictions with and without BSL were compared. Incidence was calculated as the number of unique cases of DBIH divided by the total person-years at risk and expressed as the number per 100 000 person-years...
Results: A total of 16 urban and rural jurisdictions with pit-bull bans were identified. At the provincial level, there was a significant reduction in DBIH rates from the pre-BSL to post-BSL period (3.47 (95% CI 3.17 to 3.77) per 100 000 person-years to 2.84 (95% CI 2.53 to 3.15); p=0.005). In regression restricted to two urban jurisdictions, DBIH rate in Winnipeg relative to Brandon (a city without BSL) was significantly (p<0.001) lower after BSL (rate ratio (RR)=1.10 in people of all ages and 0.92 in those aged <20 years) than before (RR=1.29 and 1.28, respectively).
Conclusion: BSL may have resulted in a reduction of DBIH in Winnipeg, and appeared more effective in protecting those aged <20 years.
Table 4, which focuses on ages 0-20 years, depicts an even greater reduction in the hospitalization incident rate. In this table, all Manitoba jurisdictions combined in the years 1984 to 2006 showed a -25.5% change in hospitalization incident rate and jurisdictions that implemented BSL sometime during the same years showed a -27.4% change in incident rate. Thus the conclusion that BSL appeared more effective in protecting those aged 20-years and younger.
Lead researcher, Dr. Malathi Raghavan, who also authored Fatal Dog Attacks in Canada, 1990-2007, said that she was surprised by the results and that the pit bull bylaws left her with a "positive impression." If one reviews Dr. Raghavan's fatality study, it is clear that this Manitoba study was a logical next step. The earlier study states that future studies should be designed to "evaluate the effectiveness of dog-bite awareness campaigns and dog-control legislation."
Combination of Three Studies is Compelling
In a subsequent article, Dr. Raghavan defends the Manitoba study by saying that it is a combination of three recent studies showing similar results that provides compelling data: The 2012 Manitoba study; the 2011 Texas study, which showed that pit bulls are associated with higher morbidity rates and higher hospital charges; and the 2010 Catalonia study, which showed a -38% change in hospitalization incident rate after jurisdictions enacted breed-specific laws.
Notably, Canada's most vocal anti-pit bull regulation advocate, Calgary's chief Animal Services officer Bill Bruce, dismissed the Manitoba study and reminded readers that border collies can "grab the role as top attack villain" too.1 After years of preaching pro-pit bull propaganda, however, Mr. Bruce saw a doubling of dog bites in his jurisdiction in 2010 as well as pit bulls biting more than all other dog breeds and overall dog bites in his jurisdiction continuing to rise in 2011.
11/14/11: Cities with Successful Pit Bull Laws; Data Shows Breed-Specific Laws Work
05/21/11: Texas Doctors Produce Study: Mortality, Mauling and Maiming by Vicious Dogs
Please donate to support our work
DogsBite.org is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt public charity organization. Learn more »
| 7/10/2012 12:56 PM |
"A City of Winnipeg e-mail response to an interview request stated the city is pleased to find support for its ban."
| 7/12/2012 8:20 PM |
In a subsequent article, Dr. Raghavan defends the Manitoba study by saying that it is a combination of three recent studies showing similar results that provides compelling data
I think it is amazing how quickly results are seen given that pit bulls are grandfathered in and there is never going to be 100% compliance.
| 8/21/2012 4:13 AM |
The Truth about the Calgarian Pit Bull Utopian Facade comes out now that Bill Bruce has retired...
Calgary data from 2003 indicate that certain breeds are overrepresented when it comes to aggressive incidents such as bites, chases and injuries. Nearly two per cent of German Shepherds, five per cent of Rottweilers and their crosses, and 15 per cent of pit bulls had been involved in an incident