Please donate to support our work is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt public charity organization. Learn more »

4 thoughts on “John Lesch's bill ushers a much needed debate on dangerous dogs

Please review our comment policy.

  1. There’s millions of dogs from other breeds owned by less than perfect, casual owners…They are not causing the massive collateral damage that the “Nanny Dogs” are.

  2. You got that right! I really like the attitude of the writer of this article. “Dog owners — some of them unable to see beyond the snouts of their dangerous pets — are organized enough to derail the bill.”

    How often do you hear that? The In-Forum editorial team nailed it! I love this too: “Dog owners can howl all they want about such characterizations.”

    I love these guys!

  3. I know there are more people that want something done everyday. The numbers just keep growing. With more citys banning the pits, more will have to. It will be a snowball effect. When they ban them in the next county, you’ll have to ban them in your’s, so they don’t just move in on you.
    I have a big map with colored pins to chart the progress. When you see it on the map it looks very encouraging.

Comments are closed.