Wednesday, September 13, 2017


Donate to DogsBite.org
Please donate to support our work

DogsBite.org is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt public charity organization. Learn more »


posted by   |  permalink  |  25 comments  | email  |icon blog rss  |icon comment rss 

Post a Comment

The DogsBite.org comment policy.

25 comments:

Blogger Ka D  |  6/26/2017 8:43 PM  |  Flag  
If I was renting a property I would not rent to anyone with a dog over 25 pounds.

Blogger Unknown  |  6/26/2017 11:15 PM  |  Flag  
The trend of renters bringing dangerous dogs into tenancy situations has bothered me for awhile now. Many are demanding that they not be 'discriminated against', still not believing that things like this can happen.

Many pit bull owners get fake service dog papers so they can rent with a pit bull, or try to pass their pit bull off as another type of dog.

Renting to tenants should not be a death sentence. In this lady's case it unfortunately was.

Blogger responsible dog guy  |  6/27/2017 10:34 AM  |  Flag  
If I ever own rental property in the future I would not allow the renters to have any pit bulls. There are safe dogs that can get over 200 pounds that I would have no problem with.

Blogger Ka D  |  6/27/2017 12:37 PM  |  Flag  
Notice how many of the danger signs were present, I'd say at least three and probably four. https://dogbitelaw.com/parents/a-dog-attack-danger-scale-to-keep-you-and-your-kids-safe

Blogger Your Quiet Neighbor  |  6/27/2017 2:51 PM  |  Flag  
This is why landlords do not allow pets in rental properties. In addition to the noise and the message, there's the risk of danger.

Blogger Annie B  |  6/27/2017 5:08 PM  |  Flag  
Dangerous dogs don't belong in society. They're too abundantly produced, dangerous aggressive dogs too often saved, dangerous dogs too often inappropriately adopted into homes with children and so many irresponsible and crap people own them. It's time to say no to loudmouths who fight for rights if animals over the safety of people in our neighborhoods. Total Pitbullshit. People are tired of it and are now speaking up. Thank GOD! Poor lady EVER trusting the "ITS HOW THEYRE RAISED" lies. So sad. We don't rent to dangerous breeds, E V E R.

Blogger Ophelia  |  6/27/2017 6:26 PM  |  Flag  
This is very said. I hope this opens the eyes of landlords and that they will start to prevent people with pits from renting under them.

Blogger B Cazz  |  6/27/2017 9:19 PM  |  Flag  
As noted by "Unknown" above, landlords MAY BE REQUIRED to accept "service" and/or "therapy" dogs regardless of size or breed.

https://adata.org/publication/service-animals-booklet
" reasonable accommodation may include waiving a no-pet rule or a pet deposit. This animal is not considered a pet."

I see a rental housing crisis coming in the future as the bite and death count rises.

Blogger LibertarianThinker  |  6/28/2017 6:59 AM  |  Flag  
Yes, as noted, landlords can't "discriminate", so if someone says their soon-to-be-killer dog is a "therapy" dog, they can't discriminate. Disgusting, sickening, etc. I don't understand why anyone would want to own a killer dog breed, and I don't understand how anyone finds this breed "cute". I personally find pitbulls ugly, which granted is subjective, but not as subjective are their mean looking eyes, the way they look at strangers as prey, instead of looking at them friendly, like most other dogs do. These dogs look scary, and it's not surprising that they kill.

Blogger Christy D  |  6/28/2017 8:45 AM  |  Flag  
Colleen, if you will allow this re-post, For everybody else, below is a go fund me a story of a pitbull attack that happened in my area this month. It's absolutely horrible reading what happened to this family. The local newspaper of coarse reported the story in such a way to make the mother look responsible for leaving her kids in a minivan with the doors open .

https://www.gofundme.com/charlieandruby

Blogger EyesOpened  |  6/28/2017 3:34 PM  |  Flag  
I also just read a story about an "emotional support" pit bull allowed in housing where pit bulls are banned. The dog ran into another apartment and killed a cat.

Like B Cazz noted, this issue is turning into a crisis. Emotional support animals are allowed in housing and on airplanes, but too many don't know the laws and so pet owners are taking advantage. I suspect that what is needed and what may happen is increased rules surrounding emotional support animals. Based on some of the problems ill-behaved ESAs are causing for true service dog handlers, I think the service dog community would be fully on board. It's really sad that people's selfishness in trying to get their pets into housing and on board airplanes for free is causing increased challenges for people needing an actual trained service dog who have enough to deal with in the first place.

I'm not against emotional support animals if they're legitimate, but some regulations and training may be needed to prevent this rampant dishonesty. In my own apartment complex where pets are not allowed, I've seen an explosion of pets over the last year or so. There was even a pit bull puppy, though thankfully I haven't seen it in quite some time and hope it moved out. But there is a boxer living on the third floor and a husky somewhere else--very poor choices for an apartment and not fair to these large, high-energy dogs. There are also a maltipoo and a maltese/shih-tzu mix, which seem far more suited (and much safer).

As we see in this story we're all commenting on, pit bulls in housing are a whole other huge issue that may cost more lives. May God bless and comfort Melissa Barnes' family.

Blogger Ka D  |  6/28/2017 7:09 PM  |  Flag  
"Emotional support dogs" and "Therapy dogs" are NOT the same as SERVICE dogs and are NOT covered under the ADA. Since service dog fraud is rampant (especially among pit owners) here is a good primer to getting rid of them: http://cravendesires.blogspot.com/2014/05/wins-are-few-and-far-between-enjoy.html

Blogger Colleen Lynn  |  6/28/2017 10:31 PM  |  Flag  
We are currently working on a long piece about the Delta attack and ESAs. So you will have plenty of space to comment when that post comes out. There are many issues involved (as you know). Go ahead and send questions/comments to info [at] dogsbite.org pertaining to ESAs and service dogs.

Blogger bcaa57  |  6/29/2017 12:18 AM  |  Flag  
Notice from his facebook page how he took the dogs outside to a natural area or some kind of park and let them run free. This is why I am leery of hiking in public areas and especially terrified of taking my kids to such places. There also always seems to be at least one at any playground I take my kids to. What gives people the right to endanger my family and force me to be afraid to take them to places where they should be able to enjoy themselves without me worrying about them getting mauled?

Blogger Colleen Lynn  |  6/29/2017 12:50 AM  |  Flag  
It's a horrible issue bcaa57. This reckless behavior infringes on all of our rights and our well being. Authorities will not act until there has been a mauling either, which leaves few choices for those who are trying to prevent an attack.

Blogger Lucu Lencia  |  6/29/2017 3:58 AM  |  Flag  
Such a shame. She probably thought the dogs were harmless, having lived next to at least one of them for 6 years... I wonder why they suddenly chose that day to attack? Perhaps because their owner wasn't home? It seems some pits only act aggressive when their owner isn't around, leading the owner to use that phrase "He's never done this before!"

Blogger EyesOpened  |  6/29/2017 4:25 PM  |  Flag  
Lucu Lencia, that is certainly a pattern. Pits often seem to attack when there are big changes in their environment: owner being out of town, getting adopted and moving to a new place, new baby in the house, etc. Of course we know they attack many other times, too, but I wonder if there's simply a connection with their overall reactivity.

I also wonder about training methods used. So many pit owners seem to be Cesar Millan devotees, and dangerous dog owners in general often talk about how these dogs need to know who's boss, how they have to be the alpha, etc. It's possible that these aversive methods are just suppressing behaviors, so in the owner's absence, the behaviors come out.

Blogger Ka D  |  6/30/2017 2:49 PM  |  Flag  
One reason the elderly are particularly vulnerable in pit bull attacks is because these people grew up and grew old during a time when a dog killing a person was unheard of. It used to be if a dog killed a CHICKEN the dog was taken out back and shot. Since the rebranding of pit bulls in the 1980's and their subsequent flood into communities dog aggression is becoming normalized by society which it should not be.

Blogger Loretta  |  7/30/2017 6:19 PM  |  Flag  
I am more than a bit concerned that children were left in the company of these animals and perhaps were victims , too, in that they witnessed a horrible, inexcusable event!
This poor, poor family-to lose their beloved mother. There is no peace for them in euthanizing these animals.
Imagine, too, the medical personnel.... what they saw and carry with them...
And what of the dog owner? How will He recover from his lack of judgement and ultimate responsibility to so many for so much?
Let us please send love and spread kindness and grace where we can and where it is most needed.
Thank you.

Blogger Alba  |  9/14/2017 2:16 PM  |  Flag  
Pit bull facts
The following information on the nation's leading canine killer was compiled from the website Dogsbite.org:
‒ 31 U.S. dog bite-related fatalities occurred in 2016. Despite being regulated in Military Housing areas and over 900 U.S. cities, pit bulls contributed to 71 percent (22) of those deaths. Pit bulls make up about 6 percent of the total U.S. dog population.
‒ 34 U.S. dog bite-related fatalities occurred in 2015. Pit bulls contributed to 82 percent (28) of these deaths. Pit bulls made up about 6.6 percent of the total U.S. dog population that year.
‒ Annual data from 2016 shows that 42 percent (13) of the fatality victims were children ages 9 years old and younger.
‒ From 2005 to 2016, pit bulls killed 254 Americans, about one person every 17 days. The next-deadliest breed over that 12-year period, rottweilers, killed 43, or one person every 102 days.
‒ From 2005 to 2016, canines killed 392 Americans. Pit bulls contributed to 65 percent (254) of those deaths.

Blogger B Cazz  |  9/15/2017 12:17 AM  |  Flag  
$15K is all this death costs the owner. My guess is he owns vehicles worth more than that.

Another vest-wearing pit appeared on the local college campus. Imagine that assigned to a dorm room with your kid. All the ESA vs. Service Animal laws in the world make no difference if there is no effective enforcement.

Blogger Packhorse  |  9/15/2017 7:31 AM  |  Flag  
The new SmartWater magazine print ad depicts a young woman jogging with a pit bull off-leash. Not only do mainstream media promote pit bull ownership, they promote irresponsible pit bull ownership, which is even more disquieting.

Blogger Your Quiet Neighbor  |  9/16/2017 2:09 PM  |  Flag  
All the more reason not to drink SmartWater.

Blogger Ka D  |  9/17/2017 10:39 AM  |  Flag  
"Not to mention funeral costs and family members who had to disrupt their lives and bank accounts to contend with this horrific sudden loss of life."- and PREVENTABLE. Yes, pit bull fatalities are very preventable. Ban the breed, no more deed. There is no NEED for pit bulls.

Blogger Ka D  |  9/19/2017 9:01 PM  |  Flag  
Loser should have gone to jail for involuntary manslaughter. This death was entirely foreseeable as are all pit bull fatalities since fighting BREED dogs were bred solely to kill. At least his stupid choice of breed was euthanized.

Post a Comment »

archives: